🚨 BREAKING: Did TPUSA's Board Violate Fiduciary Duties? ⚠️ I PROVIDE LINKS & PHONE NUMBERS TO REPORT IF YOU FEEL POTENTIAL FRAUD OR MISCONDUCT HAS TAKEN PLACE AS A DONOR ⚠️ 💸 DONORS: OFFICIAL REPORTING LINKS BELOW READ THIS ENTIRE POST. WATCH THE VIDEO. SHARE WITH EVERY TPUSA DONOR YOU KNOW. If you donated to TPUSA and were NOT informed that: • Your COO was under 9 felony indictments • A major vendor was indicted for election fraud • $475K went to that vendor AFTER indictment • The COO's salary jumped 326% during his indictment year ...then you may have grounds to question whether Arizona nonprofit disclosure requirements were met. Boards have three mandatory duties: 1️⃣ Duty of Loyalty (mission over personal interests) 2️⃣ Duty of Care (informed, documented decisions) 3️⃣ Duty of Obedience (follow the law, disclose material facts) Failure = Personal Liability. No cap on damages. ❌🧢 As a donor, you have the legal right to demand answers and file complaints if these duties were breached. POST 🚩 After April 2024 indictments, Turning Point USA's board made some interesting choices: 📊 Jake Hoffman's companies: $475,161 AFTER indictment 💰 Tyler Bowyer's compensation: $79K → $337K (year of indictment) 🔴 The Legal Problem: Arizona nonprofit law requires boards to prove payments to indicted individuals serve the mission BETTER than terminating them would. ❌ Were donors informed? 🤷 ❌ Board minutes public? 🤷 ❌ Legal justification documented? 🤷 ⚖️ The Precedent: 🔫 Wayne LaPierre (NRA): $5.4M personal liability 🪙 CFO Wilson Phillips: $2M penalties 🎯 Board Member Exposure: 🏛️ IRC §4958: Up to $20K per transaction Fiduciary breach: NO CAP on damages The indictments were PUBLIC. News coverage was EXTENSIVE. Yet payments continued without donor disclosure. 🤔 Key Questions: ❔ Why did Boyer's salary INCREASE 326% in his indictment year? ❔ Why continue paying Hoffman's banned "troll farm" companies? ❔ Did the board vote on these decisions? ❔ Were conflicts of interest properly managed⁉️ ⚠️ My Concern 👇 I believe these employment/vendor changes were made SPECIFICALLY to work around the indictments - not despite them. The timing, the amounts, the lack of transparency... it all points to a coordinated response. That's not mission-first governance. That's insider protection in my opinion based on the documented evidence. 📋 What Donors Can Do: • IRS Form 13909 (tax-exempt complaint) • Arizona AG donor protection complaints • Demand board meeting minutes • Request written business justification The law is clear: Duty of Loyalty, Duty of Care, Duty of Obedience. 🔍If you can't prove these payments served the mission better than protecting the nonprofit's reputation... 🤔That could constitute a fiduciary violation under Arizona law. 📞 REPORT HERE: 🏛️ IRS Form 13909: https://irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1 3909.pdf Mail: IRS EO Classification, MC 4910DAL, 1100 Commerce St, Dallas, TX 75242 Fax: 214-413-5415 ⚖️ Arizona AG Consumer Complaint: https://azag.gov/consumer/file- complaint Phone: (602) 542-5763 Full analysis WATCH NOW AND SHARE TO SPREAD AWARENESS ⬇️⬇️⬇️ #TPUSA #NonprofitAccountability #FiduciaryDuty @IRSnews Kristopher D Mayes https://x.com/danksterintel/status/2014798464618815547