• #GodDamnPennsylvania for this! #RestoreTheMilitia #DemandCapitalPunishment
    #Pennsylvania High Court Rules #Police Can Access #Google Searches Without Warrant Pennsylvania High Court Rules Police Can Access Google Searches Without Warrant
    #GodDamnPennsylvania for this! #RestoreTheMilitia #DemandCapitalPunishment #Pennsylvania High Court Rules #Police Can Access #Google Searches Without Warrant Pennsylvania High Court Rules Police Can Access Google Searches Without Warrant
    0 Comments 0 Shares 643 Views
  • https://www.tampafp.com/kilmar-abrego-garcia-defense-files-for-sanctions-against-trump-admin-in-tennessee-court/#google_vignette
    https://www.tampafp.com/kilmar-abrego-garcia-defense-files-for-sanctions-against-trump-admin-in-tennessee-court/#google_vignette
    WWW.TAMPAFP.COM
    Kilmar Abrego Garcia Defense Files For Sanctions Against Trump Admin In Tennessee Court
    The legal battle surrounding Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia took a sharp turn late Friday, as defense attorneys filed a motion accusing a high-ranking federal
    0 Comments 0 Shares 297 Views
  • Wow, when the liberals are responsible they don't point fingers at the weapon this time but at the shooter(s) - only because they are trying to avoid taking responsibility for their own actions...even attacking the the opposing council.

    "The city denies liability, claiming the sole responsibility for the death of Mays lies with the shooters. The 15-person jury will decide whether the City of Seattle is on the hook for millions for what city officials once described as a "summer of love.""

    https://thepostmillennial.com/courtroom-chaos-purple-haired-seattle-female-attorney-demands-judge-sanction-opposing-male-counsel-for-gender-misconduct-during-chop-trial
    Wow, when the liberals are responsible they don't point fingers at the weapon this time but at the shooter(s) - only because they are trying to avoid taking responsibility for their own actions...even attacking the the opposing council. "The city denies liability, claiming the sole responsibility for the death of Mays lies with the shooters. The 15-person jury will decide whether the City of Seattle is on the hook for millions for what city officials once described as a "summer of love."" https://thepostmillennial.com/courtroom-chaos-purple-haired-seattle-female-attorney-demands-judge-sanction-opposing-male-counsel-for-gender-misconduct-during-chop-trial
    Clown
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 1253 Views
  • #Censorship #Surveillance
    ‘Checkmate’: U.S. #SCOTUS Delivers Huge Win for #Religious Exemptions - vacated a lower court decision against a group of #Amish parents and school leaders who challenged the state of #NewYork #vaccine mandates for schools, ruling that the appeals court must reconsider the case. Today’s ruling could have implications for other states that don’t allow religious exemptions, attorneys said. - simple answer #restorethemilitia #donotcomply #demandcapitalpunishment for the thugs who force vaccines! https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/supreme-court-win-religious-exemptions-new-york-vaccine-mandate-schools/
    #Censorship #Surveillance ‘Checkmate’: U.S. #SCOTUS Delivers Huge Win for #Religious Exemptions - vacated a lower court decision against a group of #Amish parents and school leaders who challenged the state of #NewYork #vaccine mandates for schools, ruling that the appeals court must reconsider the case. Today’s ruling could have implications for other states that don’t allow religious exemptions, attorneys said. - simple answer 👉 #restorethemilitia #donotcomply #demandcapitalpunishment for the thugs who force vaccines! https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/supreme-court-win-religious-exemptions-new-york-vaccine-mandate-schools/
    CHILDRENSHEALTHDEFENSE.ORG
    ‘Checkmate’: U.S. Supreme Court Delivers Huge Win for Religious Exemptions
    The U.S. Supreme Court today reversed a lower court decision against a group of Amish parents and school leaders who challenged the state of New York’s vaccine mandates for schools, ruling that the appeals court must reconsider the case. Today’s ruling could have implications for other states that don’t allow religious exemptions, attorneys said.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2758 Views
  • https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/12/appeals-court-judges-take-boasberg-task-delay-contempt/
    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/12/appeals-court-judges-take-boasberg-task-delay-contempt/
    WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM
    NEW: Appeals Court Judges Take Boasberg to Task, Delay Contempt Hearings Until 2026 | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
    A federal appeals court on Monday took Judge Boasberg to task and delayed his contempt hearings until 2026.
    HangEm
    2
    0 Comments 0 Shares 411 Views
  • #TSA’s New Confirm ID Tax - “The power to #tax is the power to destroy.” - #SCOTUS #ChiefJustice John Marshall, 1819 Supreme Court case McCulloch v. #Maryland https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/tsas-new-confirm-id-tax/
    #TSA’s New Confirm ID Tax - “The power to #tax is the power to destroy.” - #SCOTUS #ChiefJustice John Marshall, 1819 Supreme Court case McCulloch v. #Maryland https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/tsas-new-confirm-id-tax/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2059 Views
  • #DOJ
    Department of Justice Sues #FultonCounty #Georgia Clerk of Courts For #2020Election Records https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/12/breaking-department-justice-sues-fulton-county-clerk-courts/
    #DOJ Department of Justice Sues #FultonCounty #Georgia Clerk of Courts For #2020Election Records https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/12/breaking-department-justice-sues-fulton-county-clerk-courts/
    WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM
    BREAKING: Department of Justice Sues Fulton County Clerk of Courts For 2020 Election Records | The Gateway Pundit | by Brian Lupo
    In October, the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division sent a letter to the Fulton County Board of Registration and Elections (BRE) requesting review of the election records from the 2020 election. These records had been previously ordered to be retained beyond the requirements of 52 USC 20701 due to pending litigation.
    Boom
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1633 Views
  • #Vaccine Court Awards Family $310,000, Rules #Encephalitis After #MMR Shot Killed Toddler https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaccine-court-settlement-family-infant-death-mmr-shot-encephalitis/
    #Vaccine Court Awards Family $310,000, Rules #Encephalitis After #MMR Shot Killed Toddler https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaccine-court-settlement-family-infant-death-mmr-shot-encephalitis/
    CHILDRENSHEALTHDEFENSE.ORG
    Vaccine Court Awards Family $310,000, Rules Encephalitis After MMR Shot Killed Toddler
    The family of 14-month-old Violet Skye Rodela, who died 19 days after getting an MMR and other routine vaccines, won compensation from the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program for the toddler’s death. Violet’s case, along with another case awarded earlier this year, offers lessons for future infant death cases in vaccine court, according to a working group of researchers and advocates.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1512 Views
  • https://www.theblaze.com/columns/opinion/this-supreme-court-case-could-reverse-a-century-of-bureaucratic-overreach?tpcc=email-breaking
    https://www.theblaze.com/columns/opinion/this-supreme-court-case-could-reverse-a-century-of-bureaucratic-overreach?tpcc=email-breaking
    WWW.THEBLAZE.COM
    This Supreme Court case could reverse a century of bureaucratic overreach | Blaze Media
    The administrative state has long operated as an unelected super-government. Trump v. Slaughter may be the moment voters reclaim authority over their own institutions.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 502 Views
  • Common sense has not entirely left the UK judicial system.
    https://www.wnd.com/2025/07/court-police-departments-open-advocacy-lgbt-agenda-undermined/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Court%3A_Police_dept._LGBT_advocacy
    Common sense has not entirely left the UK judicial system. https://www.wnd.com/2025/07/court-police-departments-open-advocacy-lgbt-agenda-undermined/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Court%3A_Police_dept._LGBT_advocacy
    WWW.WND.COM
    Court: Police department's open advocacy for LGBT agenda undermined public's trust * WorldNetDaily * by Bob Unruh
    Woman was investigated for 'malicious' statements for simply expressing her beliefs
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1134 Views
  • https://pjmedia.com/catherinesalgado/2025/12/09/breaking-court-upholds-trumps-trans-military-ban-n4946871
    https://pjmedia.com/catherinesalgado/2025/12/09/breaking-court-upholds-trumps-trans-military-ban-n4946871
    PJMEDIA.COM
    BREAKING: Court Upholds Trump’s Trans Military Ban
    Court upholds Trump's ban on transgender individuals in the U.S. military, a key legal victory.
    Love
    1
    1 Comments 1 Shares 1234 Views
  • https://www.wnd.com/2025/12/i-really-dont-understand-supreme-court-justice-ketanji/
    https://www.wnd.com/2025/12/i-really-dont-understand-supreme-court-justice-ketanji/
    Poo
    1
    1 Comments 0 Shares 477 Views
  • Supreme Court rules in favor of nun’s refusal to pay for abortions after the NY state government tried to force them to do so.
    https://www.wnd.com/2025/06/u-s-supreme-court-shoots-down-agenda-forcing-nuns-to-pay-for-abortions/?utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=U.S._Supreme_Court_shoots_down&utm_source=izooto
    Supreme Court rules in favor of nun’s refusal to pay for abortions after the NY state government tried to force them to do so. https://www.wnd.com/2025/06/u-s-supreme-court-shoots-down-agenda-forcing-nuns-to-pay-for-abortions/?utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=U.S._Supreme_Court_shoots_down&utm_source=izooto
    0 Comments 0 Shares 976 Views
  • #SCOTUS Lets Stand a Two-Tiered System of #Justice That Deprives #Military Families of the Same Rights Afforded to #Civilians - #GodDamnTheSCOTUS - https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/on_the_front_lines/supreme_court_lets_stand_a_two_tiered_system_of_justice_that_deprives_military_families_of_the_same_rights_afforded_to_civilians
    #SCOTUS Lets Stand a Two-Tiered System of #Justice That Deprives #Military Families of the Same Rights Afforded to #Civilians - #GodDamnTheSCOTUS - 😠😡🤬🔥❤️‍🔥https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/on_the_front_lines/supreme_court_lets_stand_a_two_tiered_system_of_justice_that_deprives_military_families_of_the_same_rights_afforded_to_civilians
    WWW.RUTHERFORD.ORG
    Wearing a Military Uniform Shouldn’t Mean Losing Your Right to Justice
    Military families deserve justice—and the Supreme Court just denied it.
    Angry
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1462 Views
  • For the eleventh time Mark Kelly I’m not giving you a dam dime. You’re a joke, traitor and dam DemonRAT. So
    Stop texting me I don’t know how you got my name and contact you worthless low life fake. I hope they court martial you.
    For the eleventh time Mark Kelly I’m not giving you a dam dime. You’re a joke, traitor and dam DemonRAT. So Stop texting me I don’t know how you got my name and contact you worthless low life fake. I hope they court martial you.
    Wow
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 1003 Views

  • Supreme Court approves new Texas Congressional map

    https://www.oann.com/newsroom/supreme-court-approves-new-texas-congressional-map/
    Supreme Court approves new Texas Congressional map https://www.oann.com/newsroom/supreme-court-approves-new-texas-congressional-map/
    WWW.OANN.COM
    Supreme Court approves new Texas Congressional map
    The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Texas Republicans’ newly redrawn congressional maps, which may give the GOP five additional seats in the House of Representatives.
    Bullseye
    Like
    3
    0 Comments 0 Shares 852 Views

  • I have asked for prayer several times, and I thank the ones that have prayed.

    My son was on the meeting for 3 hours this morning, and we are back to ground zero again. Again, I ask that Jamie (my son) and I are continued to be in prayer. This has been going on for several years now. January 4th will be the 5th year since my son was T-Boned. He had a broken neck, which he has titanium in now. He also has a huge blood spot in his back. I can't go into details because of this is going through attorneys. I pray that there is no court, that this will be settled out of court. Do you know how hard it is to hear your Child, regardless of age, puking from stress. This Momma is and fed up with everything. Many should be knowing that there is a person that is still driving and not being held responsible, for what it has done. PLEASE truly keep us in prayer. I know that at times people SAY that they will. But you see, this is My son and my lives. We are real and I know that GOD does answer prayer.
    I have asked for prayer several times, and I thank the ones that have prayed. My son was on the meeting for 3 hours this morning, and we are back to ground zero again. Again, I ask that Jamie (my son) and I are continued to be in prayer. This has been going on for several years now. January 4th will be the 5th year since my son was T-Boned. He had a broken neck, which he has titanium in now. He also has a huge blood spot in his back. I can't go into details because of this is going through attorneys. I pray that there is no court, that this will be settled out of court. Do you know how hard it is to hear your Child, regardless of age, puking from stress. This Momma is and fed up with everything. Many should be knowing that there is a person that is still driving and not being held responsible, for what it has done. PLEASE truly keep us in prayer. I know that at times people SAY that they will. But you see, this is My son and my lives. We are real and I know that GOD does answer prayer.
    Prayer
    4
    1 Comments 0 Shares 1646 Views
  • https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/12/appeals-court-rules-bats-down-biden-judge-pauses/
    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/12/appeals-court-rules-bats-down-biden-judge-pauses/
    WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM
    Appeals Court Bats Down Biden Judge, Pauses Order That Blocked Trump's Troop Deployment in DC | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
    A federal appeals court on Thursday paused a lower court’s order that would have ended President Trump’s National Guard deployment in DC.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 770 Views
  • https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/supreme-court-donald-trump-congressional-map/2025/12/04/id/1237141/
    https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/supreme-court-donald-trump-congressional-map/2025/12/04/id/1237141/
    WWW.NEWSMAX.COM
    Supreme Court Clears Texas '26 Map in Huge Win for GOP
    The Supreme Court on Thursday paved the way for Texas to use its redrawn congressional map, a major victory for Republicans who could gain as many as five seats in the 2026 midterm elections.
    Like
    Boom
    3
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1286 Views


  • Rogue courts are ignoring statutory text, inventing authority Congress denied them, and blocking the president from using the expedited removal powers Congress approved.
    Nearly 30 years ago, Congress recognized that the country could not litigate its way out of an immigration crisis.

    As part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, bipartisan majorities created expedited removal for anyone who failed to prove two years of physical presence in the United States. Anticipating a cottage industry of defense attorneys forcing the government to prove duration of unlawful stay, Congress also stripped federal courts of jurisdiction to review expedited removal orders.

    Three decades passed with little enforcement. Now, after that long dormancy, federal judges have begun reviewing cases they have no statutory authority to hear and are attempting to block President Trump from using expedited removal nationwide.

    Over the line

    On November 22, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit refused the Justice Department’s request for a stay in Make the Road New York v. Noem. The case challenges Trump’s policy expanding expedited removal to illegal aliens apprehended anywhere in the country, provided they cannot prove two years of continuous presence. Administrations since the 1990s ignored the statute and limited expedited removal to aliens caught at or near the border.
    Rogue courts are ignoring statutory text, inventing authority Congress denied them, and blocking the president from using the expedited removal powers Congress approved. Nearly 30 years ago, Congress recognized that the country could not litigate its way out of an immigration crisis. As part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, bipartisan majorities created expedited removal for anyone who failed to prove two years of physical presence in the United States. Anticipating a cottage industry of defense attorneys forcing the government to prove duration of unlawful stay, Congress also stripped federal courts of jurisdiction to review expedited removal orders. Three decades passed with little enforcement. Now, after that long dormancy, federal judges have begun reviewing cases they have no statutory authority to hear and are attempting to block President Trump from using expedited removal nationwide. Over the line On November 22, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit refused the Justice Department’s request for a stay in Make the Road New York v. Noem. The case challenges Trump’s policy expanding expedited removal to illegal aliens apprehended anywhere in the country, provided they cannot prove two years of continuous presence. Administrations since the 1990s ignored the statute and limited expedited removal to aliens caught at or near the border.
    HangEm
    1
    1 Comments 0 Shares 4578 Views


  • Rogue courts are ignoring statutory text, inventing authority Congress denied them, and blocking the president from using the expedited removal powers Congress approved.
    Nearly 30 years ago, Congress recognized that the country could not litigate its way out of an immigration crisis.

    As part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, bipartisan majorities created expedited removal for anyone who failed to prove two years of physical presence in the United States. Anticipating a cottage industry of defense attorneys forcing the government to prove duration of unlawful stay, Congress also stripped federal courts of jurisdiction to review expedited removal orders.

    Three decades passed with little enforcement. Now, after that long dormancy, federal judges have begun reviewing cases they have no statutory authority to hear and are attempting to block President Trump from using expedited removal nationwide.

    Over the line

    On November 22, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit refused the Justice Department’s request for a stay in Make the Road New York v. Noem. The case challenges Trump’s policy expanding expedited removal to illegal aliens apprehended anywhere in the country, provided they cannot prove two years of continuous presence. Administrations since the 1990s ignored the statute and limited expedited removal to aliens caught at or near the border.
    Rogue courts are ignoring statutory text, inventing authority Congress denied them, and blocking the president from using the expedited removal powers Congress approved. Nearly 30 years ago, Congress recognized that the country could not litigate its way out of an immigration crisis. As part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, bipartisan majorities created expedited removal for anyone who failed to prove two years of physical presence in the United States. Anticipating a cottage industry of defense attorneys forcing the government to prove duration of unlawful stay, Congress also stripped federal courts of jurisdiction to review expedited removal orders. Three decades passed with little enforcement. Now, after that long dormancy, federal judges have begun reviewing cases they have no statutory authority to hear and are attempting to block President Trump from using expedited removal nationwide. Over the line On November 22, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit refused the Justice Department’s request for a stay in Make the Road New York v. Noem. The case challenges Trump’s policy expanding expedited removal to illegal aliens apprehended anywhere in the country, provided they cannot prove two years of continuous presence. Administrations since the 1990s ignored the statute and limited expedited removal to aliens caught at or near the border.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 4368 Views
  • From a post on another site!

    Here is the complete 2025 playbook that an average person (or a high-school kid from Kentucky) actually has when a mega-corporation, media conglomerate, or billionaire-funded NGO defames, deplatforms, or destroys their life.

    These tools have all been used successfully in the last five years. Most are cheap or free if you know where to look.
    1. Defamation Lawsuits (SLAPPs and Anti-SLAPP)

    Regular defamation/libel/slander suit (Covington Catholic kids got $275 million total in settlements from CNN, WaPo, NBC, etc.)

    Anti-SLAPP motion (in 33 states + D.C.): if they try to SLAPP you with a frivolous countersuit, you can force them to pay your legal fees early.

    Texas Citizens Participation Act, California Anti-SLAPP, Florida’s new 2023 law — all very plaintiff-friendly now.

    Pro bono or contingency firms that hate corporate media and will take your case for free if it’s strong:

    Clare Locke LLP (Sandmann’s firm)

    Dhillon Law Group

    America First Legal (Stephen Miller’s group)

    Liberty Justice Center

    Southeastern Legal Foundation

    2. Pre-Litigation Demand Letters (the “Legal Notice”)

    A $5,000–$15,000 letter from a reputable firm often triggers seven-figure settlements because corporations fear discovery.

    Nick Sandmann’s team sent ~50 demand letters; most settled before filing.

    3. Section 230 Work-Arounds (Big Tech Specific)

    Platforms are immune for third-party content, but NOT immune for their own editorial statements (“Community Notes,” shadowban notices, “fact-check” labels). Sue for the label itself (Dominion v. Fox, Smartmatic cases).

    State-level laws bypassing 230: Texas HB20 (2022), Florida SB7072 (2021) — upheld in parts by 11th Circuit 2024.

    File in state court under deceptive trade practices or consumer-protection statutes (Missouri v. Biden precedent helps).

    4. RICO / Civil Conspiracy Claims

    When multiple media outlets + NGOs + advertisers coordinate to destroy you (GDI, NewsGuard, CCDH, Sleeping Giants boycott campaigns), you can sue the entire network under civil RICO or conspiracy.

    Missouri v. Biden (2023–2025) proved coordination between government + media + NGOs = discovery goldmine.

    5. Small-Claims or State Court “Private Nuisance” / IIED Suits

    File in small-claims court for the $10k–$25k limit — no lawyers allowed, so CNN has to send a $1,500/hr partner to rural Kentucky to defend a tweet.

    Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED) has no cap in most states and is harder to dismiss.

    6. Economic & Reputational Tools (Non-Legal but Brutal)

    Counter-boycott: publicize the advertisers and use apps like Goods Unite Us or 2ndVote to organize mass cancellation of their sponsors.

    Public records requests (FOIA/MO Sunshine) on any government official who amplified the defamation.

    Government or Public Officials also carry Public Official Bonds. It maybe easier to go after and file against the bond or you can use that in the process of getting litigation off the ground.

    Crowdfund your legal fees (GiveSendGo, Fundly, Christian crowdfunding sites raised $3M+ for Sandmann, Rittenhouse, Gibson’s Bakery).

    7. Diplomatic / Public Pressure Tools

    File ICCPR complaints with the UN Human Rights Committee (U.S. signed it; media censorship violates Article 19).

    EU citizens: file GDPR “right to be forgotten” + defamation actions in Ireland/UK against U.S. media.

    Get your Congressman or state AG to open a consumer-protection or civil-rights investigation (Missouri AG got $400M+ in settlements that way).

    8. Insurance Coverage Hacks

    Most homeowners/renters policies cover “personal injury” (including defamation). File a claim — the insurance company suddenly has a financial incentive to sue on your behalf.

    9. New 2024–2025 Weapons

    Eight states now have “Media Accountability Acts” (modeled on Texas) that strip 230 protection from outlets that act as publishers.

    Trump’s January 2025 executive order created a federal “Defamation Victims Task Force” inside DOJ — average citizens can submit cases for possible intervention.

    Bottom line: the Covington kids proved the playbook works.

    You do NOT need to be rich.

    You can do this yourself if you want to take the time to learn how or you can find a lawyer or attorney who hates the media more than he loves money, a viral clip of the lie, and the willingness to fight for 18–36 months.

    The tools are there.

    The precedent is set.

    The corporations are now terrified the next target won’t be a broke teenager — it’ll be them writing eight-figure checks.

    Use them.
    From a post on another site! Here is the complete 2025 playbook that an average person (or a high-school kid from Kentucky) actually has when a mega-corporation, media conglomerate, or billionaire-funded NGO defames, deplatforms, or destroys their life. These tools have all been used successfully in the last five years. Most are cheap or free if you know where to look. 1. Defamation Lawsuits (SLAPPs and Anti-SLAPP) Regular defamation/libel/slander suit (Covington Catholic kids got $275 million total in settlements from CNN, WaPo, NBC, etc.) Anti-SLAPP motion (in 33 states + D.C.): if they try to SLAPP you with a frivolous countersuit, you can force them to pay your legal fees early. Texas Citizens Participation Act, California Anti-SLAPP, Florida’s new 2023 law — all very plaintiff-friendly now. Pro bono or contingency firms that hate corporate media and will take your case for free if it’s strong: Clare Locke LLP (Sandmann’s firm) Dhillon Law Group America First Legal (Stephen Miller’s group) Liberty Justice Center Southeastern Legal Foundation 2. Pre-Litigation Demand Letters (the “Legal Notice”) A $5,000–$15,000 letter from a reputable firm often triggers seven-figure settlements because corporations fear discovery. Nick Sandmann’s team sent ~50 demand letters; most settled before filing. 3. Section 230 Work-Arounds (Big Tech Specific) Platforms are immune for third-party content, but NOT immune for their own editorial statements (“Community Notes,” shadowban notices, “fact-check” labels). Sue for the label itself (Dominion v. Fox, Smartmatic cases). State-level laws bypassing 230: Texas HB20 (2022), Florida SB7072 (2021) — upheld in parts by 11th Circuit 2024. File in state court under deceptive trade practices or consumer-protection statutes (Missouri v. Biden precedent helps). 4. RICO / Civil Conspiracy Claims When multiple media outlets + NGOs + advertisers coordinate to destroy you (GDI, NewsGuard, CCDH, Sleeping Giants boycott campaigns), you can sue the entire network under civil RICO or conspiracy. Missouri v. Biden (2023–2025) proved coordination between government + media + NGOs = discovery goldmine. 5. Small-Claims or State Court “Private Nuisance” / IIED Suits File in small-claims court for the $10k–$25k limit — no lawyers allowed, so CNN has to send a $1,500/hr partner to rural Kentucky to defend a tweet. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED) has no cap in most states and is harder to dismiss. 6. Economic & Reputational Tools (Non-Legal but Brutal) Counter-boycott: publicize the advertisers and use apps like Goods Unite Us or 2ndVote to organize mass cancellation of their sponsors. Public records requests (FOIA/MO Sunshine) on any government official who amplified the defamation. Government or Public Officials also carry Public Official Bonds. It maybe easier to go after and file against the bond or you can use that in the process of getting litigation off the ground. Crowdfund your legal fees (GiveSendGo, Fundly, Christian crowdfunding sites raised $3M+ for Sandmann, Rittenhouse, Gibson’s Bakery). 7. Diplomatic / Public Pressure Tools File ICCPR complaints with the UN Human Rights Committee (U.S. signed it; media censorship violates Article 19). EU citizens: file GDPR “right to be forgotten” + defamation actions in Ireland/UK against U.S. media. Get your Congressman or state AG to open a consumer-protection or civil-rights investigation (Missouri AG got $400M+ in settlements that way). 8. Insurance Coverage Hacks Most homeowners/renters policies cover “personal injury” (including defamation). File a claim — the insurance company suddenly has a financial incentive to sue on your behalf. 9. New 2024–2025 Weapons Eight states now have “Media Accountability Acts” (modeled on Texas) that strip 230 protection from outlets that act as publishers. Trump’s January 2025 executive order created a federal “Defamation Victims Task Force” inside DOJ — average citizens can submit cases for possible intervention. Bottom line: the Covington kids proved the playbook works. You do NOT need to be rich. You can do this yourself if you want to take the time to learn how or you can find a lawyer or attorney who hates the media more than he loves money, a viral clip of the lie, and the willingness to fight for 18–36 months. The tools are there. The precedent is set. The corporations are now terrified the next target won’t be a broke teenager — it’ll be them writing eight-figure checks. Use them.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 10903 Views
  • U.S. #Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    rules #USDA erred in excluding certain #GMO foods from labeling requirements https://naturalblaze.com/2025/12/appeals-court-rules-usda-erred-in-excluding-certain-gmo-foods-from-labeling-requirements.html
    U.S. #Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rules #USDA erred in excluding certain #GMO foods from labeling requirements https://naturalblaze.com/2025/12/appeals-court-rules-usda-erred-in-excluding-certain-gmo-foods-from-labeling-requirements.html
    NATURALBLAZE.COM
    Appeals court rules USDA erred in excluding certain GMO foods from labeling requirements
    Court decision challenges USDA’s exclusion of certain GMO foods from labels, emphasizing the public’s right to food transparency.
    Like
    2
    1 Comments 0 Shares 1591 Views
  • Bradlee Dean: #SCOTUS At It Again: They Decided To Let Court In #NewYork Enforce New #Gun Restrictions – Let Me Show You Where They Derive That Authority From… https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/the-us-supreme-court-at-it-again-they-decided-to-let-court-in-new-york-enforce-new-gun-restrictions-let-me-show-you-where-they-derive-that-authority-from/
    Bradlee Dean: #SCOTUS At It Again: They Decided To Let Court In #NewYork Enforce New #Gun Restrictions – Let Me Show You Where They Derive That Authority From… https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/the-us-supreme-court-at-it-again-they-decided-to-let-court-in-new-york-enforce-new-gun-restrictions-let-me-show-you-where-they-derive-that-authority-from/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1334 Views
More Results