🤥https://thepostmillennial.com/fake-image-of-kamala-as-mcdonalds-employee-goes-viral-amid-debate-over-her-job-claims
Bedrijvengids
Discover new people, create new connections, and make new friends.
- 0 Reacties 1 aandelen 783 Views 4
- And wonder how He could love me, a sinner, condemned, unclean.
How marvelous, how wonderful!
And my song shall ever be:
How marvelous, how wonderful
Is my Savior’s love for me!And wonder how He could love me, a sinner, condemned, unclean. How marvelous, how wonderful! And my song shall ever be: How marvelous, how wonderful Is my Savior’s love for me!0 Reacties 0 aandelen 385 Views - Listening to this message again has blessed my soul and reminded me of some things that I don't need to forget.
https://www.gracechurch.org/sermons/20925Listening to this message again has blessed my soul and reminded me of some things that I don't need to forget. https://www.gracechurch.org/sermons/209250 Reacties 0 aandelen 1007 Views - In his excellent piece, “Of Marriage after Divorce in Case of Adultery,” John Owen pointed out that to insist that divorce simply secures a legal separation but does not dissolve the marriage relation would bring in a state harmful to men. God has appointed marriage to be a remedy against incontinence (1 Cor. 7:2), but if innocent parties lawfully divorced may not marry again, then they are deprived of this remedy and debarred from this benefit. If the divorced person has not the gift of continency, it is the express will of God that he should marry for his relief; yet on the supposition of the objector he sins if he marries again, yea is guilty of the horrible crime of adultery. Is not this quite sufficient to expose the untenability of such and anomaly?
~A. W. PinkIn his excellent piece, “Of Marriage after Divorce in Case of Adultery,” John Owen pointed out that to insist that divorce simply secures a legal separation but does not dissolve the marriage relation would bring in a state harmful to men. God has appointed marriage to be a remedy against incontinence (1 Cor. 7:2), but if innocent parties lawfully divorced may not marry again, then they are deprived of this remedy and debarred from this benefit. If the divorced person has not the gift of continency, it is the express will of God that he should marry for his relief; yet on the supposition of the objector he sins if he marries again, yea is guilty of the horrible crime of adultery. Is not this quite sufficient to expose the untenability of such and anomaly? ~A. W. Pink0 Reacties 0 aandelen 1754 Views - AW Pink's Thoughts on Remarriage
https://ko-fi.com/post/A-W-Pinks-Thoughts-On-Remarriage-M4M015A0EIAW Pink's Thoughts on Remarriage https://ko-fi.com/post/A-W-Pinks-Thoughts-On-Remarriage-M4M015A0EI0 Reacties 0 aandelen 231 Views - The Corbett Report The Strange Story of Peter Thiel https://substack.com/home/post/p-1504705740 Reacties 0 aandelen 344 Views
- Another great rally for President Trump! https://rsbntv.maz.tv/apps/3578/1397820 Reacties 0 aandelen 429 Views1
- https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-10-25-remdesivir-papers-fauci-covid-drug-killed-military.html0 Reacties 1 aandelen 1907 Views1
- 0 Reacties 0 aandelen 160 Views
© 2025 cre8aplace 
Dutch
Dutch 
English
Arabic
French
Spanish
Portuguese
Deutsch
Turkish
Italiano
Russian
Romaian
Portuguese (Brazil)
Greek