• https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/12/appeals-court-rules-bats-down-biden-judge-pauses/
    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/12/appeals-court-rules-bats-down-biden-judge-pauses/
    WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM
    Appeals Court Bats Down Biden Judge, Pauses Order That Blocked Trump's Troop Deployment in DC | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
    A federal appeals court on Thursday paused a lower court’s order that would have ended President Trump’s National Guard deployment in DC.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 578 Views


  • Rogue courts are ignoring statutory text, inventing authority Congress denied them, and blocking the president from using the expedited removal powers Congress approved.
    Nearly 30 years ago, Congress recognized that the country could not litigate its way out of an immigration crisis.

    As part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, bipartisan majorities created expedited removal for anyone who failed to prove two years of physical presence in the United States. Anticipating a cottage industry of defense attorneys forcing the government to prove duration of unlawful stay, Congress also stripped federal courts of jurisdiction to review expedited removal orders.

    Three decades passed with little enforcement. Now, after that long dormancy, federal judges have begun reviewing cases they have no statutory authority to hear and are attempting to block President Trump from using expedited removal nationwide.

    Over the line

    On November 22, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit refused the Justice Department’s request for a stay in Make the Road New York v. Noem. The case challenges Trump’s policy expanding expedited removal to illegal aliens apprehended anywhere in the country, provided they cannot prove two years of continuous presence. Administrations since the 1990s ignored the statute and limited expedited removal to aliens caught at or near the border.
    Rogue courts are ignoring statutory text, inventing authority Congress denied them, and blocking the president from using the expedited removal powers Congress approved. Nearly 30 years ago, Congress recognized that the country could not litigate its way out of an immigration crisis. As part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, bipartisan majorities created expedited removal for anyone who failed to prove two years of physical presence in the United States. Anticipating a cottage industry of defense attorneys forcing the government to prove duration of unlawful stay, Congress also stripped federal courts of jurisdiction to review expedited removal orders. Three decades passed with little enforcement. Now, after that long dormancy, federal judges have begun reviewing cases they have no statutory authority to hear and are attempting to block President Trump from using expedited removal nationwide. Over the line On November 22, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit refused the Justice Department’s request for a stay in Make the Road New York v. Noem. The case challenges Trump’s policy expanding expedited removal to illegal aliens apprehended anywhere in the country, provided they cannot prove two years of continuous presence. Administrations since the 1990s ignored the statute and limited expedited removal to aliens caught at or near the border.
    HangEm
    1
    1 Comments 0 Shares 2890 Views


  • Rogue courts are ignoring statutory text, inventing authority Congress denied them, and blocking the president from using the expedited removal powers Congress approved.
    Nearly 30 years ago, Congress recognized that the country could not litigate its way out of an immigration crisis.

    As part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, bipartisan majorities created expedited removal for anyone who failed to prove two years of physical presence in the United States. Anticipating a cottage industry of defense attorneys forcing the government to prove duration of unlawful stay, Congress also stripped federal courts of jurisdiction to review expedited removal orders.

    Three decades passed with little enforcement. Now, after that long dormancy, federal judges have begun reviewing cases they have no statutory authority to hear and are attempting to block President Trump from using expedited removal nationwide.

    Over the line

    On November 22, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit refused the Justice Department’s request for a stay in Make the Road New York v. Noem. The case challenges Trump’s policy expanding expedited removal to illegal aliens apprehended anywhere in the country, provided they cannot prove two years of continuous presence. Administrations since the 1990s ignored the statute and limited expedited removal to aliens caught at or near the border.
    Rogue courts are ignoring statutory text, inventing authority Congress denied them, and blocking the president from using the expedited removal powers Congress approved. Nearly 30 years ago, Congress recognized that the country could not litigate its way out of an immigration crisis. As part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, bipartisan majorities created expedited removal for anyone who failed to prove two years of physical presence in the United States. Anticipating a cottage industry of defense attorneys forcing the government to prove duration of unlawful stay, Congress also stripped federal courts of jurisdiction to review expedited removal orders. Three decades passed with little enforcement. Now, after that long dormancy, federal judges have begun reviewing cases they have no statutory authority to hear and are attempting to block President Trump from using expedited removal nationwide. Over the line On November 22, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit refused the Justice Department’s request for a stay in Make the Road New York v. Noem. The case challenges Trump’s policy expanding expedited removal to illegal aliens apprehended anywhere in the country, provided they cannot prove two years of continuous presence. Administrations since the 1990s ignored the statute and limited expedited removal to aliens caught at or near the border.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2809 Views
  • U.S. #Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    rules #USDA erred in excluding certain #GMO foods from labeling requirements https://naturalblaze.com/2025/12/appeals-court-rules-usda-erred-in-excluding-certain-gmo-foods-from-labeling-requirements.html
    U.S. #Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rules #USDA erred in excluding certain #GMO foods from labeling requirements https://naturalblaze.com/2025/12/appeals-court-rules-usda-erred-in-excluding-certain-gmo-foods-from-labeling-requirements.html
    NATURALBLAZE.COM
    Appeals court rules USDA erred in excluding certain GMO foods from labeling requirements
    Court decision challenges USDA’s exclusion of certain GMO foods from labels, emphasizing the public’s right to food transparency.
    Like
    2
    1 Comments 0 Shares 1250 Views
  • This is interesting...BUT I used to work Property Tax and actually worked this area. From Springfield.. Property tax is set by the STATE OF IL not Chicago. AND the State is to TEACH the Assessors Office Personnel The people ALL NEED to Appeal. Some one is apparently wanting that location...it makes you wonder WHAT MINERAL OR MINERALS ARE UNDER THE PROPERTIES.
    This is interesting...BUT I used to work Property Tax and actually worked this area. From Springfield.. Property tax is set by the STATE OF IL not Chicago. AND the State is to TEACH the Assessors Office Personnel The people ALL NEED to Appeal. Some one is apparently wanting that location...it makes you wonder WHAT MINERAL OR MINERALS ARE UNDER THE PROPERTIES.
    Angry
    Thinking
    2
    0 Comments 0 Shares 714 Views
  • I would say an organized petition and appeal to AG Bondi would be in order and hopefully one that will draw her attention.
    https://truthsocial.com/@2024Zohar/posts/115622982823501608
    I would say an organized petition and appeal to AG Bondi would be in order and hopefully one that will draw her attention. https://truthsocial.com/@2024Zohar/posts/115622982823501608
    0 Comments 0 Shares 798 Views
  • https://www.oann.com/newsroom/bondi-set-to-appeal-dismissals-of-james-comeys-and-letitia-james-criminal-cases/
    https://www.oann.com/newsroom/bondi-set-to-appeal-dismissals-of-james-comeys-and-letitia-james-criminal-cases/
    WWW.OANN.COM
    Bondi set to appeal dismissals of James Comey’s and Letitia James’ criminal cases
    Attorney General Pam Bondi vowed to immediately appeal a judge’s recent decision to toss out criminal cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.
    Like
    Bullseye
    4
    0 Comments 0 Shares 798 Views
  • An Appeal to Charismatic Pretenders
    John MacArthur
    https://youtu.be/iXGyWWTVeoQ?si=5cUP0MVd0EoxehzK
    #SundaySentiments
    An Appeal to Charismatic Pretenders John MacArthur https://youtu.be/iXGyWWTVeoQ?si=5cUP0MVd0EoxehzK #SundaySentiments
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1276 Views
  • https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/11/d-c-appeals-court-strikes-down-trump-dots/
    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/11/d-c-appeals-court-strikes-down-trump-dots/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 508 Views
  • But it's just fine if a man believes he's a woman...

    ""The First Amendment would ring hollow if courts were allowed to simply declare that plainly religious beliefs are not religious,""

    https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/abortion/appeals-court-reinstates-lawsuit-against-oregon-forcing-pro-life-group
    But it's just fine if a man believes he's a woman... ""The First Amendment would ring hollow if courts were allowed to simply declare that plainly religious beliefs are not religious,"" https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/abortion/appeals-court-reinstates-lawsuit-against-oregon-forcing-pro-life-group
    JUSTTHENEWS.COM
    Appeals court reinstates lawsuit against Oregon for forcing pro-life group into abortion plan
    Oregon Right to Life's challenge must be reviewed in light of Supreme Court precedent against requiring "proselytization" to qualify for religious protections, Trump and Obama nominees say. State denied exemption based on "traditional Judeo-Christian beliefs."
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2433 Views
  • #Economy
    #DonaldTrump Files Emergency Appeal To Block Full Release Of #SNAP Funds https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-files-emergency-appeal-block-full-release-snap-funds
    #Economy #DonaldTrump Files Emergency Appeal To Block Full Release Of #SNAP Funds 😠😡🤬 https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-files-emergency-appeal-block-full-release-snap-funds
    WWW.ZEROHEDGE.COM
    Trump Files Emergency Appeal To Block Full Release Of SNAP Funds
    "This is a crisis, to be sure, but it is a crisis occasioned by congressional failure..."
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1901 Views
  • https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-files-powerhouse-appeal-politically-charged-manhattan-district-attorney-case
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-files-powerhouse-appeal-politically-charged-manhattan-district-attorney-case
    WWW.FOXNEWS.COM
    Trump files ‘powerhouse’ appeal in 'politically charged' Manhattan district attorney case
    FIRST ON FOX: President Trump’s legal team filed a “powerhouse" appeal in Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s case against him, demanding the verdict be thrown out.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1493 Views
  • If SCOTUS rules in favor of the public display of the Ten Commandments in Louisiana, then this will embolden other states and locales to also pass legislation calling for the display of the Ten Commandments in publicly funded schools and other public institutions.
    https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/appeals-court-allows-partial-implementation-louisianas-ten-commandments
    If SCOTUS rules in favor of the public display of the Ten Commandments in Louisiana, then this will embolden other states and locales to also pass legislation calling for the display of the Ten Commandments in publicly funded schools and other public institutions. https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/appeals-court-allows-partial-implementation-louisianas-ten-commandments
    JUSTTHENEWS.COM
    Appeals court allows partial implementation of Louisiana's Ten Commandments law
    The law, signed by Gov. Jeff Landry earlier this year, requires public schools to prominently display the Ten Commandments in classrooms by Jan. 1.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1833 Views
  • #Texas Third Court Of Appeals Just Ruled That #Infowars Could Be Closed As Soon As Just 5 Days!!! https://www.infowars.com/posts/breaking-exclusive-the-texas-third-court-of-appeals-just-ruled-that-infowars-could-be-closed-as-soon-as-just-5-days
    #Texas Third Court Of Appeals Just Ruled That #Infowars Could Be Closed As Soon As Just 5 Days!!! https://www.infowars.com/posts/breaking-exclusive-the-texas-third-court-of-appeals-just-ruled-that-infowars-could-be-closed-as-soon-as-just-5-days
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1254 Views
  • Believer, imagine the thoughts that ran through the minds of Christ’s disciples, when He asked, “You do not want to go away also, do you?” (Jn. 6:67). Jesus had just spoken of Himself as the bread of life, saying that His body was true bread and His blood true drink, and the Jews, taking Him literally, were dumbfounded. They could not comprehend how they could possibly eat Jesus flesh and drink His blood. Their eyes were not able to see, nor were there ears able to hear, so they turned and left.

    Thus, Jesus questioned His close associates, “do you want to leave too?” But they had eyes to see and ears to hear. Peter responded, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have words of eternal life” (Jn. 6:68).

    What a wonderful recognition. It is not, however, simply recognition, but revelation! Jesus explained, again (Jn. 6:65), to His apostles, when many walked away, that this was why He had told them earlier no one could come to Him unless the Father first draws him (Jn. 6:44). He even goes on to say that those who were with Him were with Him, not because they chose Him, but because He chose them (Jn. 6:70).

    How humbling a situation! The author of life, the one who came to lay His down as a ransom (Mk. 10:45), chose and opened the eyes of those who walked with Him. Jesus affirms this when He tells Peter that flesh and blood did not reveal to Peter that Jesus is the Son of the living God, but that God Himself revealed it to Peter (Mt. 16:15-17).

    No one can receive the gospel unless God first opens their heart. All others have been blinded to the truth of the gospel by the god of this world (2 Cor. 4:4), and such natural men can neither receive nor understand the things of God because they do not have His Spirit (1 Cor. 2:14).

    Christian, be grateful and humbled that the God who created you did so with a vision to save you and adopt you into His family, calling you a child of God (Eph. 1:3-6). There is no room for boasting or arrogance; for we have nothing that we did not receive (1 Cor. 4:6-7).

    Therefore, with humility of mind, remember the condition in which you were when Christ called you, and turn not away from the One who affected your salvation, but instead, preach Him boldly, that others He calls might also come and not be turned away.

    ——————
    Spurgeon’s Morning and Evening Devotions

    Morning, October 23

    "Will ye also go away?" John 6:67

    Many have forsaken Christ, and have walked no more with Him; but what reason have YOU to make a change? Has there been any reason for it in the past? Has not Jesus proved Himself all-sufficient? He appeals to you this morning- "Have I been a wilderness unto you?" When your soul has simply trusted Jesus, have you ever been confounded? Have you not up till now found your Lord to be a compassionate and generous friend to you, and has not simple faith in Him given you all the peace your spirit could desire? Can you so much as dream of a better friend than He has been to you? Then change not the old and tried for new and false. As for the present, can that compel you to leave Christ? When we are hard beset with this world, or with the severer trials within the Church, we find it a most blessed thing to pillow our head upon the bosom of our Saviour. This is the joy we have today that we are saved in Him; and if this joy be satisfying, wherefore should we think of changing? Who barters gold for dross? We will not forswear the sun till we find a better light, nor leave our Lord until a brighter lover shall appear; and, since this can never be, we will hold Him with a grasp immortal, and bind His name as a seal upon our arm. As for the future, can you suggest anything which can arise that shall render it necessary for you to mutiny, or desert the old flag to serve under another captain? We think not. If life be long- He changes not. If we are poor, what better than to have Christ who can make us rich? When we are sick, what more do we want than Jesus to make our bed in our sickness? When we die, is it not written that "neither death, nor life, nor things present, nor things to come, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord!" We say with Peter, "Lord, to whom shall we go?"
    Believer, imagine the thoughts that ran through the minds of Christ’s disciples, when He asked, “You do not want to go away also, do you?” (Jn. 6:67). Jesus had just spoken of Himself as the bread of life, saying that His body was true bread and His blood true drink, and the Jews, taking Him literally, were dumbfounded. They could not comprehend how they could possibly eat Jesus flesh and drink His blood. Their eyes were not able to see, nor were there ears able to hear, so they turned and left. Thus, Jesus questioned His close associates, “do you want to leave too?” But they had eyes to see and ears to hear. Peter responded, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have words of eternal life” (Jn. 6:68). What a wonderful recognition. It is not, however, simply recognition, but revelation! Jesus explained, again (Jn. 6:65), to His apostles, when many walked away, that this was why He had told them earlier no one could come to Him unless the Father first draws him (Jn. 6:44). He even goes on to say that those who were with Him were with Him, not because they chose Him, but because He chose them (Jn. 6:70). How humbling a situation! The author of life, the one who came to lay His down as a ransom (Mk. 10:45), chose and opened the eyes of those who walked with Him. Jesus affirms this when He tells Peter that flesh and blood did not reveal to Peter that Jesus is the Son of the living God, but that God Himself revealed it to Peter (Mt. 16:15-17). No one can receive the gospel unless God first opens their heart. All others have been blinded to the truth of the gospel by the god of this world (2 Cor. 4:4), and such natural men can neither receive nor understand the things of God because they do not have His Spirit (1 Cor. 2:14). Christian, be grateful and humbled that the God who created you did so with a vision to save you and adopt you into His family, calling you a child of God (Eph. 1:3-6). There is no room for boasting or arrogance; for we have nothing that we did not receive (1 Cor. 4:6-7). Therefore, with humility of mind, remember the condition in which you were when Christ called you, and turn not away from the One who affected your salvation, but instead, preach Him boldly, that others He calls might also come and not be turned away. —————— Spurgeon’s Morning and Evening Devotions Morning, October 23 "Will ye also go away?" John 6:67 Many have forsaken Christ, and have walked no more with Him; but what reason have YOU to make a change? Has there been any reason for it in the past? Has not Jesus proved Himself all-sufficient? He appeals to you this morning- "Have I been a wilderness unto you?" When your soul has simply trusted Jesus, have you ever been confounded? Have you not up till now found your Lord to be a compassionate and generous friend to you, and has not simple faith in Him given you all the peace your spirit could desire? Can you so much as dream of a better friend than He has been to you? Then change not the old and tried for new and false. As for the present, can that compel you to leave Christ? When we are hard beset with this world, or with the severer trials within the Church, we find it a most blessed thing to pillow our head upon the bosom of our Saviour. This is the joy we have today that we are saved in Him; and if this joy be satisfying, wherefore should we think of changing? Who barters gold for dross? We will not forswear the sun till we find a better light, nor leave our Lord until a brighter lover shall appear; and, since this can never be, we will hold Him with a grasp immortal, and bind His name as a seal upon our arm. As for the future, can you suggest anything which can arise that shall render it necessary for you to mutiny, or desert the old flag to serve under another captain? We think not. If life be long- He changes not. If we are poor, what better than to have Christ who can make us rich? When we are sick, what more do we want than Jesus to make our bed in our sickness? When we die, is it not written that "neither death, nor life, nor things present, nor things to come, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord!" We say with Peter, "Lord, to whom shall we go?"
    Like
    2
    0 Comments 1 Shares 5996 Views
  • Texas Doctor Will Appeal Medical Board’s Reprimand Over Attempt to Provide Ivermectin to COVID Patient
    https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/texas-doctor-will-appeal-medical?publication_id=400535&post_id=176511772&isFreemail=true&r=1maoyr&triedRedirect=true&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
    Texas Doctor Will Appeal Medical Board’s Reprimand Over Attempt to Provide Ivermectin to COVID Patient https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/texas-doctor-will-appeal-medical?publication_id=400535&post_id=176511772&isFreemail=true&r=1maoyr&triedRedirect=true&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
    Like
    Boom
    2
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2939 Views
  • Tina Peters has been released from prison. She was sentenced to jail time related to her actions during the 2020 election but has since been released on bond pending appeal. For the latest updates, checking reliable news sources is recommended, as situations can change rapidly.


    THAT WAS FROM AN AI INQUIRY - looking for news reports.
    Tina Peters has been released from prison. She was sentenced to jail time related to her actions during the 2020 election but has since been released on bond pending appeal. For the latest updates, checking reliable news sources is recommended, as situations can change rapidly. THAT WAS FROM AN AI INQUIRY - looking for news reports.
    Like
    2
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2083 Views
  • John MacArthur
    An Appeal to Charismatic Pretenders
    Matthew 7:13-27
    https://youtu.be/iXGyWWTVeoQ?si=WD8LKnrenA46Ro42
    John MacArthur An Appeal to Charismatic Pretenders Matthew 7:13-27 https://youtu.be/iXGyWWTVeoQ?si=WD8LKnrenA46Ro42
    0 Comments 0 Shares 991 Views
  • https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/10/breaking-appeals-court-lifts-judges-order-blocking-trump/
    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/10/breaking-appeals-court-lifts-judges-order-blocking-trump/
    WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM
    BREAKING: Appeals Court Lifts Judge's Order Blocking Trump From Mobilizing Oregon National Guard Troops | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
    A federal appeals court on Wednesday lifted a judge’s order blocking President Trump from federalizing Oregon National Guard Troops.
    Salute
    Boom
    Bullseye
    5
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1146 Views
  • https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/donald-trump-birthright-citizenship-appeals-court/2025/10/03/id/1228978/
    https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/donald-trump-birthright-citizenship-appeals-court/2025/10/03/id/1228978/
    WWW.NEWSMAX.COM
    Appeals Court Rejects End to Birthright Citizenship
    The Trump administration's attempts to end birthright citizenship received a stinging rebuke Friday in a decision by the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
    Dislike
    Angry
    4
    2 Comments 0 Shares 1445 Views
  • https://www.oann.com/newsroom/appeals-court-upholds-83-3m-ruling-in-e-jean-carroll-defamation-case-against-trump/
    https://www.oann.com/newsroom/appeals-court-upholds-83-3m-ruling-in-e-jean-carroll-defamation-case-against-trump/
    WWW.OANN.COM
    Appeals court upholds $83.3M ruling in E. Jean Carroll defamation case against Trump
    A federal appeals court upheld the $88.3 million judgement imposed on President Donald Trump in regards to a defamation verdict of writer E. Jean Carroll.
    Poo
    Face Palm
    HangEm
    4
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1559 Views
  • https://www.oann.com/newsroom/appeals-court-alligator-alcatraz-may-continue-its-immigration-operations/
    https://www.oann.com/newsroom/appeals-court-alligator-alcatraz-may-continue-its-immigration-operations/
    WWW.OANN.COM
    Appeals Court: ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ may continue its immigration operations
    A federal appeals court has cleared the way for the Florida immigration detention center “Alligator Alcatraz” to continue operating while a legal challenge against the state and the Trump administration proceeds through the courts.
    Bullseye
    Boom
    Grimacing
    3
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1673 Views
  • US Appeals Court Rules Trump’s Use of Wartime Law for Deportations Is Illegal
    https://www.ntd.com/us-appeals-court-rules-trumps-use-of-wartime-law-for-deportations-is-illegal_1088552.html?utm_source=ntddailynoe&src_src=ntddailynoe&utm_campaign=ntd-2025-09-03&src_cmp=ntd-2025-09-03&utm_medium=email
    US Appeals Court Rules Trump’s Use of Wartime Law for Deportations Is Illegal https://www.ntd.com/us-appeals-court-rules-trumps-use-of-wartime-law-for-deportations-is-illegal_1088552.html?utm_source=ntddailynoe&src_src=ntddailynoe&utm_campaign=ntd-2025-09-03&src_cmp=ntd-2025-09-03&utm_medium=email
    WWW.NTD.COM
    US Appeals Court Rules Trump’s Use of Wartime Law for Deportations Is Illegal
    The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals barred the Trump administration from carrying out deportations under the wartime law in certain states.
    Dislike
    HangEm
    2
    1 Comments 0 Shares 2304 Views
  • https://redstate.com/streiff/2025/08/26/federal-appeal-of-alligator-alcatraz-ruling-claims-massive-errors-and-favoritism-the-obama-judge-n2193253
    https://redstate.com/streiff/2025/08/26/federal-appeal-of-alligator-alcatraz-ruling-claims-massive-errors-and-favoritism-the-obama-judge-n2193253
    REDSTATE.COM
    Florida's Appeal of Alligator Alcatraz Ruling Claims Massive Errors and Bias by the Obama Judge
    Federal appeal challenges Alligator Alcatraz ruling, citing errors and judicial bias.
    Boom
    Like
    3
    0 Comments 1 Shares 2223 Views
More Results