Part and parcel to the Swamp...

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/02/federal-appeals-court-tosses-justice-departments-misconduct-complaint/

Interesting follow up on the Consequences of Daniel Pearl's Beheading
Legal Proceedings:
Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh: He was arrested and convicted in 2002 for the murder of Daniel Pearl. Initially sentenced to death, his conviction was overturned by a Pakistani court in 2020, leading to significant public outcry and legal appeals from Pearl's family.
Co-conspirators: Three other individuals were sentenced to life in prison for their roles in the kidnapping and murder. However, in early 2021, Pakistan's Supreme Court ordered their release, which was met with condemnation from Pearl's family and U.S. officials.

https://x.com/PatriotMarkCook/status/2011639626214096908

This could re-open and reverse the case against Tina Peters!

Mark Cook's testimony Jan 14th. 2026 before the Colorado Appeals Court.

We may be at odds with Mamdani over much (and rightfully so) but one thing that we should be able to agree on is that small businesses should not be burdened with excessive fees and fines. We’ll see if he will be able to keep that promise to the small businesses of NYC.

It does need to be made clear, however, that supporting small businesses does happen to be a tenet of MAGA to which Mamdani, for whatever his reasons might be, has decided to appeal in this case.
https://x.com/ZohranKMamdani/status/1994890085477601610

Mis-gender someone in Britain and you may get reported to their counter-terrorism division despite the fact that no one is under any legal obligation to call anyone by their preferred pronouns.
https://www.christianpost.com/news/british-street-preacher-appeals-conviction-for-misgendering.html?utm_source=webapp&utm_medium=notification&utm_content=headline&utm_source=onesignal&utm_campaign=2023-03-08

Rogue courts are ignoring statutory text, inventing authority Congress denied them, and blocking the president from using the expedited removal powers Congress approved.
Nearly 30 years ago, Congress recognized that the country could not litigate its way out of an immigration crisis.

As part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, bipartisan majorities created expedited removal for anyone who failed to prove two years of physical presence in the United States. Anticipating a cottage industry of defense attorneys forcing the government to prove duration of unlawful stay, Congress also stripped federal courts of jurisdiction to review expedited removal orders.

Three decades passed with little enforcement. Now, after that long dormancy, federal judges have begun reviewing cases they have no statutory authority to hear and are attempting to block President Trump from using expedited removal nationwide.

Over the line

On November 22, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit refused the Justice Department’s request for a stay in Make the Road New York v. Noem. The case challenges Trump’s policy expanding expedited removal to illegal aliens apprehended anywhere in the country, provided they cannot prove two years of continuous presence. Administrations since the 1990s ignored the statute and limited expedited removal to aliens caught at or near the border.

Rogue courts are ignoring statutory text, inventing authority Congress denied them, and blocking the president from using the expedited removal powers Congress approved.
Nearly 30 years ago, Congress recognized that the country could not litigate its way out of an immigration crisis.

As part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, bipartisan majorities created expedited removal for anyone who failed to prove two years of physical presence in the United States. Anticipating a cottage industry of defense attorneys forcing the government to prove duration of unlawful stay, Congress also stripped federal courts of jurisdiction to review expedited removal orders.

Three decades passed with little enforcement. Now, after that long dormancy, federal judges have begun reviewing cases they have no statutory authority to hear and are attempting to block President Trump from using expedited removal nationwide.

Over the line

On November 22, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit refused the Justice Department’s request for a stay in Make the Road New York v. Noem. The case challenges Trump’s policy expanding expedited removal to illegal aliens apprehended anywhere in the country, provided they cannot prove two years of continuous presence. Administrations since the 1990s ignored the statute and limited expedited removal to aliens caught at or near the border.

This is interesting...BUT I used to work Property Tax and actually worked this area. From Springfield.. Property tax is set by the STATE OF IL not Chicago. AND the State is to TEACH the Assessors Office Personnel The people ALL NEED to Appeal. Some one is apparently wanting that location...it makes you wonder WHAT MINERAL OR MINERALS ARE UNDER THE PROPERTIES.

I would say an organized petition and appeal to AG Bondi would be in order and hopefully one that will draw her attention.
https://truthsocial.com/@2024Zohar/posts/115622982823501608

An Appeal to Charismatic Pretenders
John MacArthur
https://youtu.be/iXGyWWTVeoQ?si=5cUP0MVd0EoxehzK
#SundaySentiments

But it's just fine if a man believes he's a woman...

""The First Amendment would ring hollow if courts were allowed to simply declare that plainly religious beliefs are not religious,""

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/abortion/appeals-court-reinstates-lawsuit-against-oregon-forcing-pro-life-group

If SCOTUS rules in favor of the public display of the Ten Commandments in Louisiana, then this will embolden other states and locales to also pass legislation calling for the display of the Ten Commandments in publicly funded schools and other public institutions.
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/appeals-court-allows-partial-implementation-louisianas-ten-commandments

Believer, imagine the thoughts that ran through the minds of Christ’s disciples, when He asked, “You do not want to go away also, do you?” (Jn. 6:67). Jesus had just spoken of Himself as the bread of life, saying that His body was true bread and His blood true drink, and the Jews, taking Him literally, were dumbfounded. They could not comprehend how they could possibly eat Jesus flesh and drink His blood. Their eyes were not able to see, nor were there ears able to hear, so they turned and left.

Thus, Jesus questioned His close associates, “do you want to leave too?” But they had eyes to see and ears to hear. Peter responded, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have words of eternal life” (Jn. 6:68).

What a wonderful recognition. It is not, however, simply recognition, but revelation! Jesus explained, again (Jn. 6:65), to His apostles, when many walked away, that this was why He had told them earlier no one could come to Him unless the Father first draws him (Jn. 6:44). He even goes on to say that those who were with Him were with Him, not because they chose Him, but because He chose them (Jn. 6:70).

How humbling a situation! The author of life, the one who came to lay His down as a ransom (Mk. 10:45), chose and opened the eyes of those who walked with Him. Jesus affirms this when He tells Peter that flesh and blood did not reveal to Peter that Jesus is the Son of the living God, but that God Himself revealed it to Peter (Mt. 16:15-17).

No one can receive the gospel unless God first opens their heart. All others have been blinded to the truth of the gospel by the god of this world (2 Cor. 4:4), and such natural men can neither receive nor understand the things of God because they do not have His Spirit (1 Cor. 2:14).

Christian, be grateful and humbled that the God who created you did so with a vision to save you and adopt you into His family, calling you a child of God (Eph. 1:3-6). There is no room for boasting or arrogance; for we have nothing that we did not receive (1 Cor. 4:6-7).

Therefore, with humility of mind, remember the condition in which you were when Christ called you, and turn not away from the One who affected your salvation, but instead, preach Him boldly, that others He calls might also come and not be turned away.

——————
Spurgeon’s Morning and Evening Devotions

Morning, October 23

"Will ye also go away?" John 6:67

Many have forsaken Christ, and have walked no more with Him; but what reason have YOU to make a change? Has there been any reason for it in the past? Has not Jesus proved Himself all-sufficient? He appeals to you this morning- "Have I been a wilderness unto you?" When your soul has simply trusted Jesus, have you ever been confounded? Have you not up till now found your Lord to be a compassionate and generous friend to you, and has not simple faith in Him given you all the peace your spirit could desire? Can you so much as dream of a better friend than He has been to you? Then change not the old and tried for new and false. As for the present, can that compel you to leave Christ? When we are hard beset with this world, or with the severer trials within the Church, we find it a most blessed thing to pillow our head upon the bosom of our Saviour. This is the joy we have today that we are saved in Him; and if this joy be satisfying, wherefore should we think of changing? Who barters gold for dross? We will not forswear the sun till we find a better light, nor leave our Lord until a brighter lover shall appear; and, since this can never be, we will hold Him with a grasp immortal, and bind His name as a seal upon our arm. As for the future, can you suggest anything which can arise that shall render it necessary for you to mutiny, or desert the old flag to serve under another captain? We think not. If life be long- He changes not. If we are poor, what better than to have Christ who can make us rich? When we are sick, what more do we want than Jesus to make our bed in our sickness? When we die, is it not written that "neither death, nor life, nor things present, nor things to come, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord!" We say with Peter, "Lord, to whom shall we go?"

Texas Doctor Will Appeal Medical Board’s Reprimand Over Attempt to Provide Ivermectin to COVID Patient
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/texas-doctor-will-appeal-medical?publication_id=400535&post_id=176511772&isFreemail=true&r=1maoyr&triedRedirect=true&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Tina Peters has been released from prison. She was sentenced to jail time related to her actions during the 2020 election but has since been released on bond pending appeal. For the latest updates, checking reliable news sources is recommended, as situations can change rapidly.


THAT WAS FROM AN AI INQUIRY - looking for news reports.