https://www.oann.com/newsroom/whoopi-goldberg-corrected-by-iranian-dissidents-following-her-claim-that-life-for-black-americans-is-equivalent-to-living-under-iranian-autocracy/
Directory
Discover new people, create new connections, and make new friends.
- 1 Comments 0 Shares 71 Views2
- https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/donald-trump-iran-libya/2025/06/19/id/1215711/0 Comments 0 Shares 64 Views1
- feelings about a new war with Iran are like watching your Mother-in-law drive off a cliff in a brand-new Cadillac, there are mixed emotions about that!feelings about a new war with Iran are like watching your Mother-in-law drive off a cliff in a brand-new Cadillac, there are mixed emotions about that! 😉0 Comments 0 Shares 64 Views3
- For anyone who thinks the NFA was ever about anything other than tax and control (not safety), directly from the ATF's own website:
"While the NFA was enacted by Congress as an exercise of its authority to tax, the NFA had an underlying purpose unrelated to revenue collection. As the legislative history of the law discloses, its underlying purpose was to curtail, if not prohibit, transactions in NFA firearms. Congress found these firearms to pose a significant crime problem because of their frequent use in crime, particularly the gangland crimes of that era such as the St. Valentine’s Day Massacre. The $200 making and transfer taxes on most NFA firearms were considered quite severe and adequate to carry out Congress’ purpose to discourage or eliminate transactions in these firearms. The $200 tax has not changed since 1934." - https://atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/laws-alcohol-tobacco-firearms-and-explosives/national-firearms-act
As for the "underlying purpose," yes, it was an attempt at prohibition, just like the prohibition of alcohol. It was NOT about safety, nor, as is stated there, about "crime," because in 1934, during the great depression, when the NFA was enacted, the only people who could afford a $200 tax stamp were the criminals the law was allegedly aimed at stopping. No, just as with government today, this was not about safety or crime - it was about control (making firearms and accessories too expensive for most to purchase) and government getting its cut.For anyone who thinks the NFA was ever about anything other than tax and control (not safety), directly from the ATF's own website: "While the NFA was enacted by Congress as an exercise of its authority to tax, the NFA had an underlying purpose unrelated to revenue collection. As the legislative history of the law discloses, its underlying purpose was to curtail, if not prohibit, transactions in NFA firearms. Congress found these firearms to pose a significant crime problem because of their frequent use in crime, particularly the gangland crimes of that era such as the St. Valentine’s Day Massacre. The $200 making and transfer taxes on most NFA firearms were considered quite severe and adequate to carry out Congress’ purpose to discourage or eliminate transactions in these firearms. The $200 tax has not changed since 1934." - https://atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/laws-alcohol-tobacco-firearms-and-explosives/national-firearms-act As for the "underlying purpose," yes, it was an attempt at prohibition, just like the prohibition of alcohol. It was NOT about safety, nor, as is stated there, about "crime," because in 1934, during the great depression, when the NFA was enacted, the only people who could afford a $200 tax stamp were the criminals the law was allegedly aimed at stopping. No, just as with government today, this was not about safety or crime - it was about control (making firearms and accessories too expensive for most to purchase) and government getting its cut.0 Comments 1 Shares 117 Views3
- For anyone who thinks the NFA was ever about anything other than tax and control (not safety), directly from the ATF's own website:
"While the NFA was enacted by Congress as an exercise of its authority to tax, the NFA had an underlying purpose unrelated to revenue collection. As the legislative history of the law discloses, its underlying purpose was to curtail, if not prohibit, transactions in NFA firearms. Congress found these firearms to pose a significant crime problem because of their frequent use in crime, particularly the gangland crimes of that era such as the St. Valentine’s Day Massacre. The $200 making and transfer taxes on most NFA firearms were considered quite severe and adequate to carry out Congress’ purpose to discourage or eliminate transactions in these firearms. The $200 tax has not changed since 1934." - https://atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/laws-alcohol-tobacco-firearms-and-explosives/national-firearms-act
As for the "underlying purpose," yes, it was an attempt at prohibition, just like the prohibition of alcohol. It was NOT about safety, nor, as is stated there, about "crime," because in 1934, during the great depression, when the NFA was enacted, the only people who could afford a $200 tax stamp were the criminals the law was allegedly aimed at stopping. No, just as with government today, this was not about safety or crime - it was about control (making firearms and accessories too expensive for most to purchase) and government getting its cut.0 Comments 0 Shares 48 Views - https://lawenforcementtoday.com/hed-tbd-al-qaeda-sympathizer-found-teaching-at-nyc-mosque-in-staten-island0 Comments 0 Shares 57 Views
- https://www.realtalkwithzuby.com/p/honour-your-father-and-mother0 Comments 0 Shares 47 Views2
- It clicked over yesterday.
https://usdebtclock.org/It clicked over yesterday. https://usdebtclock.org/0 Comments 0 Shares 47 Views1
- [3jeepsdeep] , [Chad] Which do you prefer? We gots chunky, projectile, and backup.2 Comments 0 Shares 53 Views
© 2025 cre8aplace 
English
English 
Arabic
French
Spanish
Portuguese
Deutsch
Turkish
Dutch
Italiano
Russian
Romaian
Portuguese (Brazil)
Greek