• circuit protection market Outlook 2026: Growth Drivers, Challenges, and Future Opportunities https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/circuit-protection-market-29015 #circuit, #protection, #market, #circuitprotectionmarket
    circuit protection market Outlook 2026: Growth Drivers, Challenges, and Future Opportunities https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/circuit-protection-market-29015 #circuit, #protection, #market, #circuitprotectionmarket
    WWW.MARKETRESEARCHFUTURE.COM
    Circuit Protection Market Size, Share and Industry Report 2035
    Circuit Protection Market is predicted to reach USD 89.23 Billion at a CAGR of 5.62% by 2035, Global Circuit Protection Industry Growth by Type, Application, Voltage Rating, Current Rating, Technology, Region
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 82 Visualizações
  • Dangerous indeed!
    Just consider the last "planneddemic"!
    How many people died or were maimed for life because of that idiocy?
    People who were not doctors (politicians and executives) and had ZERO medical experience basically sentenced millions of people to die or be permanently disabled!

    "The Ninth Circuit held that due to a legal principle known as rational basis review, judges don’t need to consider whether a mandated medical intervention actually prevents disease as long as the government policy is rational. According to the ruling, as long as politicians and executive officials could have believed a medical intervention serves public health, the courts need not become involved.

    The plaintiffs warn this reasoning is unprecedented—and dangerous."

    https://healthfreedomdefense.org/lawsuit-urges-supreme-court-to-review-ruling-that-allows-limitless-state-power-under-the-guise-of-public-health/
    Dangerous indeed! Just consider the last "planneddemic"! How many people died or were maimed for life because of that idiocy? People who were not doctors (politicians and executives) and had ZERO medical experience basically sentenced millions of people to die or be permanently disabled! "The Ninth Circuit held that due to a legal principle known as rational basis review, judges don’t need to consider whether a mandated medical intervention actually prevents disease as long as the government policy is rational. According to the ruling, as long as politicians and executive officials could have believed a medical intervention serves public health, the courts need not become involved. The plaintiffs warn this reasoning is unprecedented—and dangerous." https://healthfreedomdefense.org/lawsuit-urges-supreme-court-to-review-ruling-that-allows-limitless-state-power-under-the-guise-of-public-health/
    Bullseye
    2
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 2466 Visualizações
  • Fifth Circuit: libraries don't have to buy LGBTQ porn
    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/12/fifth_circuit_libraries_don_t_have_to_buy_lgbtq_porn.html
    Fifth Circuit: libraries don't have to buy LGBTQ porn https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/12/fifth_circuit_libraries_don_t_have_to_buy_lgbtq_porn.html
    WWW.AMERICANTHINKER.COM
    Fifth Circuit: libraries don't have to buy LGBTQ porn
    Supposed censorship of library books took off as a faux-major issue during the Biden’s Handlers’ Administration. This was almost entirely in response to local efforts to remove LGBTQWERTY+- books from public and school libraries, or to at...
    Like
    1
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 711 Visualizações


  • Rogue courts are ignoring statutory text, inventing authority Congress denied them, and blocking the president from using the expedited removal powers Congress approved.
    Nearly 30 years ago, Congress recognized that the country could not litigate its way out of an immigration crisis.

    As part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, bipartisan majorities created expedited removal for anyone who failed to prove two years of physical presence in the United States. Anticipating a cottage industry of defense attorneys forcing the government to prove duration of unlawful stay, Congress also stripped federal courts of jurisdiction to review expedited removal orders.

    Three decades passed with little enforcement. Now, after that long dormancy, federal judges have begun reviewing cases they have no statutory authority to hear and are attempting to block President Trump from using expedited removal nationwide.

    Over the line

    On November 22, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit refused the Justice Department’s request for a stay in Make the Road New York v. Noem. The case challenges Trump’s policy expanding expedited removal to illegal aliens apprehended anywhere in the country, provided they cannot prove two years of continuous presence. Administrations since the 1990s ignored the statute and limited expedited removal to aliens caught at or near the border.
    Rogue courts are ignoring statutory text, inventing authority Congress denied them, and blocking the president from using the expedited removal powers Congress approved. Nearly 30 years ago, Congress recognized that the country could not litigate its way out of an immigration crisis. As part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, bipartisan majorities created expedited removal for anyone who failed to prove two years of physical presence in the United States. Anticipating a cottage industry of defense attorneys forcing the government to prove duration of unlawful stay, Congress also stripped federal courts of jurisdiction to review expedited removal orders. Three decades passed with little enforcement. Now, after that long dormancy, federal judges have begun reviewing cases they have no statutory authority to hear and are attempting to block President Trump from using expedited removal nationwide. Over the line On November 22, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit refused the Justice Department’s request for a stay in Make the Road New York v. Noem. The case challenges Trump’s policy expanding expedited removal to illegal aliens apprehended anywhere in the country, provided they cannot prove two years of continuous presence. Administrations since the 1990s ignored the statute and limited expedited removal to aliens caught at or near the border.
    HangEm
    1
    1 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 6776 Visualizações


  • Rogue courts are ignoring statutory text, inventing authority Congress denied them, and blocking the president from using the expedited removal powers Congress approved.
    Nearly 30 years ago, Congress recognized that the country could not litigate its way out of an immigration crisis.

    As part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, bipartisan majorities created expedited removal for anyone who failed to prove two years of physical presence in the United States. Anticipating a cottage industry of defense attorneys forcing the government to prove duration of unlawful stay, Congress also stripped federal courts of jurisdiction to review expedited removal orders.

    Three decades passed with little enforcement. Now, after that long dormancy, federal judges have begun reviewing cases they have no statutory authority to hear and are attempting to block President Trump from using expedited removal nationwide.

    Over the line

    On November 22, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit refused the Justice Department’s request for a stay in Make the Road New York v. Noem. The case challenges Trump’s policy expanding expedited removal to illegal aliens apprehended anywhere in the country, provided they cannot prove two years of continuous presence. Administrations since the 1990s ignored the statute and limited expedited removal to aliens caught at or near the border.
    Rogue courts are ignoring statutory text, inventing authority Congress denied them, and blocking the president from using the expedited removal powers Congress approved. Nearly 30 years ago, Congress recognized that the country could not litigate its way out of an immigration crisis. As part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, bipartisan majorities created expedited removal for anyone who failed to prove two years of physical presence in the United States. Anticipating a cottage industry of defense attorneys forcing the government to prove duration of unlawful stay, Congress also stripped federal courts of jurisdiction to review expedited removal orders. Three decades passed with little enforcement. Now, after that long dormancy, federal judges have begun reviewing cases they have no statutory authority to hear and are attempting to block President Trump from using expedited removal nationwide. Over the line On November 22, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit refused the Justice Department’s request for a stay in Make the Road New York v. Noem. The case challenges Trump’s policy expanding expedited removal to illegal aliens apprehended anywhere in the country, provided they cannot prove two years of continuous presence. Administrations since the 1990s ignored the statute and limited expedited removal to aliens caught at or near the border.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 6475 Visualizações
  • From a post on another site!

    Here is the complete 2025 playbook that an average person (or a high-school kid from Kentucky) actually has when a mega-corporation, media conglomerate, or billionaire-funded NGO defames, deplatforms, or destroys their life.

    These tools have all been used successfully in the last five years. Most are cheap or free if you know where to look.
    1. Defamation Lawsuits (SLAPPs and Anti-SLAPP)

    Regular defamation/libel/slander suit (Covington Catholic kids got $275 million total in settlements from CNN, WaPo, NBC, etc.)

    Anti-SLAPP motion (in 33 states + D.C.): if they try to SLAPP you with a frivolous countersuit, you can force them to pay your legal fees early.

    Texas Citizens Participation Act, California Anti-SLAPP, Florida’s new 2023 law — all very plaintiff-friendly now.

    Pro bono or contingency firms that hate corporate media and will take your case for free if it’s strong:

    Clare Locke LLP (Sandmann’s firm)

    Dhillon Law Group

    America First Legal (Stephen Miller’s group)

    Liberty Justice Center

    Southeastern Legal Foundation

    2. Pre-Litigation Demand Letters (the “Legal Notice”)

    A $5,000–$15,000 letter from a reputable firm often triggers seven-figure settlements because corporations fear discovery.

    Nick Sandmann’s team sent ~50 demand letters; most settled before filing.

    3. Section 230 Work-Arounds (Big Tech Specific)

    Platforms are immune for third-party content, but NOT immune for their own editorial statements (“Community Notes,” shadowban notices, “fact-check” labels). Sue for the label itself (Dominion v. Fox, Smartmatic cases).

    State-level laws bypassing 230: Texas HB20 (2022), Florida SB7072 (2021) — upheld in parts by 11th Circuit 2024.

    File in state court under deceptive trade practices or consumer-protection statutes (Missouri v. Biden precedent helps).

    4. RICO / Civil Conspiracy Claims

    When multiple media outlets + NGOs + advertisers coordinate to destroy you (GDI, NewsGuard, CCDH, Sleeping Giants boycott campaigns), you can sue the entire network under civil RICO or conspiracy.

    Missouri v. Biden (2023–2025) proved coordination between government + media + NGOs = discovery goldmine.

    5. Small-Claims or State Court “Private Nuisance” / IIED Suits

    File in small-claims court for the $10k–$25k limit — no lawyers allowed, so CNN has to send a $1,500/hr partner to rural Kentucky to defend a tweet.

    Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED) has no cap in most states and is harder to dismiss.

    6. Economic & Reputational Tools (Non-Legal but Brutal)

    Counter-boycott: publicize the advertisers and use apps like Goods Unite Us or 2ndVote to organize mass cancellation of their sponsors.

    Public records requests (FOIA/MO Sunshine) on any government official who amplified the defamation.

    Government or Public Officials also carry Public Official Bonds. It maybe easier to go after and file against the bond or you can use that in the process of getting litigation off the ground.

    Crowdfund your legal fees (GiveSendGo, Fundly, Christian crowdfunding sites raised $3M+ for Sandmann, Rittenhouse, Gibson’s Bakery).

    7. Diplomatic / Public Pressure Tools

    File ICCPR complaints with the UN Human Rights Committee (U.S. signed it; media censorship violates Article 19).

    EU citizens: file GDPR “right to be forgotten” + defamation actions in Ireland/UK against U.S. media.

    Get your Congressman or state AG to open a consumer-protection or civil-rights investigation (Missouri AG got $400M+ in settlements that way).

    8. Insurance Coverage Hacks

    Most homeowners/renters policies cover “personal injury” (including defamation). File a claim — the insurance company suddenly has a financial incentive to sue on your behalf.

    9. New 2024–2025 Weapons

    Eight states now have “Media Accountability Acts” (modeled on Texas) that strip 230 protection from outlets that act as publishers.

    Trump’s January 2025 executive order created a federal “Defamation Victims Task Force” inside DOJ — average citizens can submit cases for possible intervention.

    Bottom line: the Covington kids proved the playbook works.

    You do NOT need to be rich.

    You can do this yourself if you want to take the time to learn how or you can find a lawyer or attorney who hates the media more than he loves money, a viral clip of the lie, and the willingness to fight for 18–36 months.

    The tools are there.

    The precedent is set.

    The corporations are now terrified the next target won’t be a broke teenager — it’ll be them writing eight-figure checks.

    Use them.
    From a post on another site! Here is the complete 2025 playbook that an average person (or a high-school kid from Kentucky) actually has when a mega-corporation, media conglomerate, or billionaire-funded NGO defames, deplatforms, or destroys their life. These tools have all been used successfully in the last five years. Most are cheap or free if you know where to look. 1. Defamation Lawsuits (SLAPPs and Anti-SLAPP) Regular defamation/libel/slander suit (Covington Catholic kids got $275 million total in settlements from CNN, WaPo, NBC, etc.) Anti-SLAPP motion (in 33 states + D.C.): if they try to SLAPP you with a frivolous countersuit, you can force them to pay your legal fees early. Texas Citizens Participation Act, California Anti-SLAPP, Florida’s new 2023 law — all very plaintiff-friendly now. Pro bono or contingency firms that hate corporate media and will take your case for free if it’s strong: Clare Locke LLP (Sandmann’s firm) Dhillon Law Group America First Legal (Stephen Miller’s group) Liberty Justice Center Southeastern Legal Foundation 2. Pre-Litigation Demand Letters (the “Legal Notice”) A $5,000–$15,000 letter from a reputable firm often triggers seven-figure settlements because corporations fear discovery. Nick Sandmann’s team sent ~50 demand letters; most settled before filing. 3. Section 230 Work-Arounds (Big Tech Specific) Platforms are immune for third-party content, but NOT immune for their own editorial statements (“Community Notes,” shadowban notices, “fact-check” labels). Sue for the label itself (Dominion v. Fox, Smartmatic cases). State-level laws bypassing 230: Texas HB20 (2022), Florida SB7072 (2021) — upheld in parts by 11th Circuit 2024. File in state court under deceptive trade practices or consumer-protection statutes (Missouri v. Biden precedent helps). 4. RICO / Civil Conspiracy Claims When multiple media outlets + NGOs + advertisers coordinate to destroy you (GDI, NewsGuard, CCDH, Sleeping Giants boycott campaigns), you can sue the entire network under civil RICO or conspiracy. Missouri v. Biden (2023–2025) proved coordination between government + media + NGOs = discovery goldmine. 5. Small-Claims or State Court “Private Nuisance” / IIED Suits File in small-claims court for the $10k–$25k limit — no lawyers allowed, so CNN has to send a $1,500/hr partner to rural Kentucky to defend a tweet. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED) has no cap in most states and is harder to dismiss. 6. Economic & Reputational Tools (Non-Legal but Brutal) Counter-boycott: publicize the advertisers and use apps like Goods Unite Us or 2ndVote to organize mass cancellation of their sponsors. Public records requests (FOIA/MO Sunshine) on any government official who amplified the defamation. Government or Public Officials also carry Public Official Bonds. It maybe easier to go after and file against the bond or you can use that in the process of getting litigation off the ground. Crowdfund your legal fees (GiveSendGo, Fundly, Christian crowdfunding sites raised $3M+ for Sandmann, Rittenhouse, Gibson’s Bakery). 7. Diplomatic / Public Pressure Tools File ICCPR complaints with the UN Human Rights Committee (U.S. signed it; media censorship violates Article 19). EU citizens: file GDPR “right to be forgotten” + defamation actions in Ireland/UK against U.S. media. Get your Congressman or state AG to open a consumer-protection or civil-rights investigation (Missouri AG got $400M+ in settlements that way). 8. Insurance Coverage Hacks Most homeowners/renters policies cover “personal injury” (including defamation). File a claim — the insurance company suddenly has a financial incentive to sue on your behalf. 9. New 2024–2025 Weapons Eight states now have “Media Accountability Acts” (modeled on Texas) that strip 230 protection from outlets that act as publishers. Trump’s January 2025 executive order created a federal “Defamation Victims Task Force” inside DOJ — average citizens can submit cases for possible intervention. Bottom line: the Covington kids proved the playbook works. You do NOT need to be rich. You can do this yourself if you want to take the time to learn how or you can find a lawyer or attorney who hates the media more than he loves money, a viral clip of the lie, and the willingness to fight for 18–36 months. The tools are there. The precedent is set. The corporations are now terrified the next target won’t be a broke teenager — it’ll be them writing eight-figure checks. Use them.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 17442 Visualizações
  • U.S. #Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    rules #USDA erred in excluding certain #GMO foods from labeling requirements https://naturalblaze.com/2025/12/appeals-court-rules-usda-erred-in-excluding-certain-gmo-foods-from-labeling-requirements.html
    U.S. #Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rules #USDA erred in excluding certain #GMO foods from labeling requirements https://naturalblaze.com/2025/12/appeals-court-rules-usda-erred-in-excluding-certain-gmo-foods-from-labeling-requirements.html
    NATURALBLAZE.COM
    Appeals court rules USDA erred in excluding certain GMO foods from labeling requirements
    Court decision challenges USDA’s exclusion of certain GMO foods from labels, emphasizing the public’s right to food transparency.
    Like
    2
    1 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 2595 Visualizações
  • VICTORY FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM: The 4th Circuit Upholds #ReligiousFreedom by Saying, A Person Needn't Explain How Any Particular Tenet or Principle of Her #Religion Prohibited #Vaccination https://therebelpatient.substack.com/p/victory-for-religious-freedom-the
    VICTORY FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM: The 4th Circuit Upholds #ReligiousFreedom by Saying, A Person Needn't Explain How Any Particular Tenet or Principle of Her #Religion Prohibited #Vaccination https://therebelpatient.substack.com/p/victory-for-religious-freedom-the
    THEREBELPATIENT.SUBSTACK.COM
    VICTORY FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM: The 4th Circuit Upholds Religious Freedom by Saying, "A Person Needn't Explain How Any Particular Tenet or Principle of Her Religion Prohibited Vaccination"
    The court clarified that “sincerity” is the core test under Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (2014), not doctrinal dissection. This very much lowers the bar for plaintiffs.
    Like
    1
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 2968 Visualizações

  • Ecclesiastes
    Chapter 1

    1 The words of the Preacher, the son of David, king in Jerusalem.

    2 Vanity of vanities, saith the Preacher, vanity of vanities; all is vanity.

    3 What profit hath a man of all his labour which he taketh under the sun?

    4 One generation passeth away, and another generation cometh: but the earth abideth for ever.

    5 The sun also ariseth, and the sun goeth down, and hasteth to his place where he arose.

    6 The wind goeth toward the south, and turneth about unto the north; it whirleth about continually, and the wind returneth again according to his circuits.

    7 All the rivers run into the sea; yet the sea is not full; unto the place from whence the rivers come, thither they return again.

    8 All things are full of labour; man cannot utter it: the eye is not satisfied with seeing, nor the ear filled with hearing.

    9 The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.

    10 Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? it hath been already of old time, which was before us.

    11 There is no remembrance of former things; neither shall there be any remembrance of things that are to come with those that shall come after.

    12 I the Preacher was king over Israel in Jerusalem.

    13 And I gave my heart to seek and search out by wisdom concerning all things that are done under heaven: this sore travail hath God given to the sons of man to be exercised therewith.

    14 I have seen all the works that are done under the sun; and, behold, all is vanity and vexation of spirit.

    15 That which is crooked cannot be made straight: and that which is wanting cannot be numbered.

    16 I communed with mine own heart, saying, Lo, I am come to great estate, and have gotten more wisdom than all they that have been before me in Jerusalem: yea, my heart had great experience of wisdom and knowledge.

    17 And I gave my heart to know wisdom, and to know madness and folly: I perceived that this also is vexation of spirit.

    18 For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow.
    Ecclesiastes Chapter 1 1 The words of the Preacher, the son of David, king in Jerusalem. 2 Vanity of vanities, saith the Preacher, vanity of vanities; all is vanity. 3 What profit hath a man of all his labour which he taketh under the sun? 4 One generation passeth away, and another generation cometh: but the earth abideth for ever. 5 The sun also ariseth, and the sun goeth down, and hasteth to his place where he arose. 6 The wind goeth toward the south, and turneth about unto the north; it whirleth about continually, and the wind returneth again according to his circuits. 7 All the rivers run into the sea; yet the sea is not full; unto the place from whence the rivers come, thither they return again. 8 All things are full of labour; man cannot utter it: the eye is not satisfied with seeing, nor the ear filled with hearing. 9 The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun. 10 Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? it hath been already of old time, which was before us. 11 There is no remembrance of former things; neither shall there be any remembrance of things that are to come with those that shall come after. 12 I the Preacher was king over Israel in Jerusalem. 13 And I gave my heart to seek and search out by wisdom concerning all things that are done under heaven: this sore travail hath God given to the sons of man to be exercised therewith. 14 I have seen all the works that are done under the sun; and, behold, all is vanity and vexation of spirit. 15 That which is crooked cannot be made straight: and that which is wanting cannot be numbered. 16 I communed with mine own heart, saying, Lo, I am come to great estate, and have gotten more wisdom than all they that have been before me in Jerusalem: yea, my heart had great experience of wisdom and knowledge. 17 And I gave my heart to know wisdom, and to know madness and folly: I perceived that this also is vexation of spirit. 18 For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow.
    Like
    Love
    3
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 3133 Visualizações

  • “An Inquisitor Rather Than a Neutral Adjudicator”: Seventh Circuit Slams Judge Over ICE Order in Chicago
    https://jonathanturley.org/2025/11/01/an-inquisitor-rather-than-a-neutral-adjudicator-seventh-circuit-lifts-restraining-order-on-immigration-officers-in-chicago/
    “An Inquisitor Rather Than a Neutral Adjudicator”: Seventh Circuit Slams Judge Over ICE Order in Chicago https://jonathanturley.org/2025/11/01/an-inquisitor-rather-than-a-neutral-adjudicator-seventh-circuit-lifts-restraining-order-on-immigration-officers-in-chicago/
    JONATHANTURLEY.ORG
    “An Inquisitor Rather Than a Neutral Adjudicator”: Seventh Circuit Slams Judge Over ICE Order in Chicago
    The United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit yesterday overturned a federal judge’s order requiring Immigration and Customs Enforcement Chief Greg Bovino to give daily immigra…
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 2043 Visualizações
  • #MAGA VICTORY: 9th Circuit Hands #DonaldTrump Sweeping Win Over #GavinNewsom#Trump Can Federalize #California #NationalGuard To Enforce Deportations! https://www.infowars.com/posts/maga-victory-9th-circuit-hands-trump-sweeping-win-over-newsom-trump-can-federalize-california-national-guard-to-enforce-deportations
    #MAGA VICTORY: 9th Circuit Hands #DonaldTrump Sweeping Win Over #GavinNewsom — #Trump Can Federalize #California #NationalGuard To Enforce Deportations! https://www.infowars.com/posts/maga-victory-9th-circuit-hands-trump-sweeping-win-over-newsom-trump-can-federalize-california-national-guard-to-enforce-deportations
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 4291 Visualizações
  • https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/09/breaking-11th-circuit-court-blocks-obama-judges-order/
    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/09/breaking-11th-circuit-court-blocks-obama-judges-order/
    Like
    Bullseye
    3
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 1755 Visualizações
  • 7th Circuit Panel Upholds Illinois Public Transit Concealed Carry Ban
    https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment/2025/09/03/7th-circuit-panel-upholds-illinois-public-transit-concealed-carry-ban/
    7th Circuit Panel Upholds Illinois Public Transit Concealed Carry Ban https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment/2025/09/03/7th-circuit-panel-upholds-illinois-public-transit-concealed-carry-ban/
    WWW.BREITBART.COM
    7th Circuit Panel Upholds Illinois Public Transit Concealed Carry Ban
    A three-judge panel for the Seventh Circuit overturned a lower court ruling and upheld a concealed carry ban Illinois on public transit.
    Face Palm
    1
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 2120 Visualizações
  • https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/07/just-circuit-court-overturns-pro-trump-meme-maker/
    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/07/just-circuit-court-overturns-pro-trump-meme-maker/
    Like
    1
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 1443 Visualizações
  • Be sure to READ what is on the frame as well.

    COVID Shots | "Particles Like Circles & Squares Floating Around...You Would See Almost Like Long Wires Starting to Form...It Looks Like the Image of a Circuit Board..." - Dr. Suzanne Humphries + U.S. $136 Trillion Debt? Daniel 2?

    https://rumble.com/v6uvxn7-covid-shots-particles-like-circles-and-squares-floating.html
    Be sure to READ what is on the frame as well. COVID Shots | "Particles Like Circles & Squares Floating Around...You Would See Almost Like Long Wires Starting to Form...It Looks Like the Image of a Circuit Board..." - Dr. Suzanne Humphries + U.S. $136 Trillion Debt? Daniel 2? https://rumble.com/v6uvxn7-covid-shots-particles-like-circles-and-squares-floating.html
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 4145 Visualizações
  • https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/06/ninth-circuit-unanimously-upholds-second-amendment-foundation-victory/
    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/06/ninth-circuit-unanimously-upholds-second-amendment-foundation-victory/
    Boom
    1
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 1550 Visualizações
  • National Guard troops will stay under Trump’s control, for now, under 9th Circuit order
    americanmilitarynews.com
    National Guard troops will stay under Trump’s control, for now, under 9th Circuit order americanmilitarynews.com
    Like
    1
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 3007 Visualizações

  • LINCOLN’S VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION

    The Presidential oath of office that Lincoln swore to was "to preserve, protect and defend" the Constitution of the US.

    I apologize up front for truthful, accurate, factual posts here that may hurt any Lincoln fan's feelings...

    Secession of states was not prohibited by the US Constitution at that time. Therefore it was completely legal...


    #1 Lincoln ordered the military blockade of Southern ports.

    This an act of war.

    Only Congress can do that.

    At that time Lincoln certainly violated the US Constitution.


    #2 Lincoln ordered hundreds of Northern newspapers who dared to speak out against him to be shut down. And their owners and editors were arrested for disloyalty.

    This is a clear violation of the 1st Amendment of the Constitution that Lincoln swore to uphold.


    #3 Lincoln ordered the arrest of Ohio Congressman Clement Vallandigham for the crime of speaking out against him.

    Can you imagine that?


    #4 Ex parte Merryman,

    Chief Justice of the US Roger Taney, sitting as a judge of the United States Circuit Court for the District of Maryland, ruled that Lincoln had violated the US Constitution when he illegally suspended the Writ of Habeas Corpus.

    After hearing this Lincoln signed an arrest warrant to have the Chief Justice of the US arrested.

    #5 US Constitution Article lll...

    Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them.

    Lincoln committed treason.

    Lincoln waged war upon his own country. Unless one considers secession legal and the Confederacy was a sovereign nation.

    #6 Lincoln sent Union troops door to door in areas of Maryland, a Union state, to confiscate weapons.

    This is a clear violation of the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution.

    _____________________________

    Many Constitutional violations against Maryland

    'Maryland my Maryland' was published calling Lincoln a tyrant and a despot and a vandal.

    Lincoln as already mentioned, trashed the Constitution by suspending the Writ of Habeas Corpus and sending troops door to door confiscating weapons in areas of Maryland.

    Maryland was a Union state.

    Lincoln ordered the arrest of thousands Marylanders for the crime of 'suspected Southern sympathies'.

    Lincoln ordered the arrest of US Congressman Henry May representing Maryland. #7

    Lincoln also had arrested...

    Most of the Maryland State Legislature #8

    Most of the Baltimore city council #9

    The police commissioner of Baltimore #10

    The mayor of Baltimore #11

    Thousands of prominent Maryland citizens. #12

    These people were arrested and held in Military prisons, without trial, some of them for years.

    This trashing of the Constitution upset many Marylanders. One of them was named Booth.

    Committing so many crimes against Maryland would end up giving Lincoln a big "headache".

    SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS



    April 25 1861, When it looks as though Maryland may secede from the Union, Lincoln sends a letter to General Winfield Scott giving him permission to bombard Maryland's Cities.

    This war criminal Lincoln couldn't wait to bombard innocent civilians. We call that Terrorism these days.



    #13 Lincoln issues the Emancipation Proclamation.

    This is a direct violation of the US Constitution and the US Supreme Courts decision on the matter.



    #14 The Lincoln administration allowed the taking of private property for public use without just compensation or due process of law.

    This is a clear violation of the 5th Amendment.

    A prime example is the Union army stealing Robert E Lees home, Arlington House, which they used as Headquarters.

    Since dead Union soldiers were stacking up like cordwood, they started burying them in Lee's yard. There were so many Union soldiers graves here, this was to become Arlington National Cemetery.


    #15 The Lincoln Administration routinely used water torture against the thousands of Union prisoners arrested and jailed without trail.

    This violates the 8th Amendment,

    "Cruel and unusual punishment".


    #16 Lincoln was Commander-in-Chief of an Army whose invasion of the South resulted in the deaths of 50,000 Southern civilians.
    LINCOLN’S VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION The Presidential oath of office that Lincoln swore to was "to preserve, protect and defend" the Constitution of the US. I apologize up front for truthful, accurate, factual posts here that may hurt any Lincoln fan's feelings... Secession of states was not prohibited by the US Constitution at that time. Therefore it was completely legal... #1 Lincoln ordered the military blockade of Southern ports. This an act of war. Only Congress can do that. At that time Lincoln certainly violated the US Constitution. #2 Lincoln ordered hundreds of Northern newspapers who dared to speak out against him to be shut down. And their owners and editors were arrested for disloyalty. This is a clear violation of the 1st Amendment of the Constitution that Lincoln swore to uphold. #3 Lincoln ordered the arrest of Ohio Congressman Clement Vallandigham for the crime of speaking out against him. Can you imagine that? #4 Ex parte Merryman, Chief Justice of the US Roger Taney, sitting as a judge of the United States Circuit Court for the District of Maryland, ruled that Lincoln had violated the US Constitution when he illegally suspended the Writ of Habeas Corpus. After hearing this Lincoln signed an arrest warrant to have the Chief Justice of the US arrested. #5 US Constitution Article lll... Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them. Lincoln committed treason. Lincoln waged war upon his own country. Unless one considers secession legal and the Confederacy was a sovereign nation. #6 Lincoln sent Union troops door to door in areas of Maryland, a Union state, to confiscate weapons. This is a clear violation of the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution. _____________________________ Many Constitutional violations against Maryland 'Maryland my Maryland' was published calling Lincoln a tyrant and a despot and a vandal. Lincoln as already mentioned, trashed the Constitution by suspending the Writ of Habeas Corpus and sending troops door to door confiscating weapons in areas of Maryland. Maryland was a Union state. Lincoln ordered the arrest of thousands Marylanders for the crime of 'suspected Southern sympathies'. Lincoln ordered the arrest of US Congressman Henry May representing Maryland. #7 Lincoln also had arrested... Most of the Maryland State Legislature #8 Most of the Baltimore city council #9 The police commissioner of Baltimore #10 The mayor of Baltimore #11 Thousands of prominent Maryland citizens. #12 These people were arrested and held in Military prisons, without trial, some of them for years. This trashing of the Constitution upset many Marylanders. One of them was named Booth. Committing so many crimes against Maryland would end up giving Lincoln a big "headache". SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS April 25 1861, When it looks as though Maryland may secede from the Union, Lincoln sends a letter to General Winfield Scott giving him permission to bombard Maryland's Cities. This war criminal Lincoln couldn't wait to bombard innocent civilians. We call that Terrorism these days. #13 Lincoln issues the Emancipation Proclamation. This is a direct violation of the US Constitution and the US Supreme Courts decision on the matter. #14 The Lincoln administration allowed the taking of private property for public use without just compensation or due process of law. This is a clear violation of the 5th Amendment. A prime example is the Union army stealing Robert E Lees home, Arlington House, which they used as Headquarters. Since dead Union soldiers were stacking up like cordwood, they started burying them in Lee's yard. There were so many Union soldiers graves here, this was to become Arlington National Cemetery. #15 The Lincoln Administration routinely used water torture against the thousands of Union prisoners arrested and jailed without trail. This violates the 8th Amendment, "Cruel and unusual punishment". #16 Lincoln was Commander-in-Chief of an Army whose invasion of the South resulted in the deaths of 50,000 Southern civilians.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 29165 Visualizações
  • https://www.mrctv.org/blog/p-gardner-goldsmith/fifth-circuit-affirms-fundamental-right-18-20-year-olds-possess-guns
    https://www.mrctv.org/blog/p-gardner-goldsmith/fifth-circuit-affirms-fundamental-right-18-20-year-olds-possess-guns
    WWW.MRCTV.ORG
    Fifth Circuit Affirms Fundamental Right of 18-20 Year-Olds To Possess Guns
    There should be no question about Natural Rights -- no carve-outs allowing politicians to curtail and abridge them, even as they try to excuse such attacks by referring to OTHER, old attacks on rights they might find in US history. Upholding freedom requires clear and strong adherence to principle, which is something most tax-paid judges are unwilling to offer.
    Like
    Boom
    3
    2 Comentários 1 Compartilhamentos 5278 Visualizações

  • https://local12.com/news/nation-world/volkswagen-recalls-recalled-recalling-vehicles-for-doors-opening-unexpectedly-while-driving-hazard-deaths-injuries-models-electric-suv-crossover-german-automobile-dangerous-problem-issue-free-fix-replace-dealers-software-water-circuit-board#
    https://local12.com/news/nation-world/volkswagen-recalls-recalled-recalling-vehicles-for-doors-opening-unexpectedly-while-driving-hazard-deaths-injuries-models-electric-suv-crossover-german-automobile-dangerous-problem-issue-free-fix-replace-dealers-software-water-circuit-board#
    LOCAL12.COM
    Volkswagen recalls vehicles for doors opening unexpectedly while driving
    Volkswagen recalled nearly 100,000 of its SUVs because of a door issue.
    Haha
    Grimacing
    2
    1 Comentários 1 Compartilhamentos 11280 Visualizações
  • https://www.oann.com/business/bmw-recalls-over-720000-vehicles-over-short-circuit-concern-nhtsa-says/
    https://www.oann.com/business/bmw-recalls-over-720000-vehicles-over-short-circuit-concern-nhtsa-says/
    WWW.OANN.COM
    BMW recalls over 720,000 vehicles over short circuit concern, NHTSA says
    BMW is recalling 720,796 U.S. vehicles over concerns of a short circuit, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said.
    Face Palm
    1
    0 Comentários 1 Compartilhamentos 10909 Visualizações
  • https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/fifth-circuit-hands-texas-major-win-rio-grande-river-buoy-lawsuit
    https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/fifth-circuit-hands-texas-major-win-rio-grande-river-buoy-lawsuit
    JUSTTHENEWS.COM
    Federal appeals court hands Texas major border win, ruling state can use buoys on Rio Grande River
    Appeals judges voted 9-7 to revers a district court’s preliminary injunction that had kept state from using buoys to stop illegal immigration.
    Like
    Patriot
    2
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 4649 Visualizações


  • Donald J. Trump

    @realDonaldTrump

    ARIZONA SENATE GOP: “Today, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of election integrity! Voters in Arizona who register with the state and do not provide proof of citizenship will be rejected.”

    "This is a victory for election integrity in Arizona. Only U.S. citizens should be allowed to vote in our elections. It sounds like common sense, but the radical left elected officials in our state continue to reject this notion, disrespecting the voices of our lawful Arizona voters. We are grateful the court is upholding this provision in our law, and it's time for Congress to take action to ensure only lawful U.S. citizens are voting in federal races."
    -Warren Petersen https://www.azsenaterepublicans.gov/_files/ugd/2f3470_b0c9c2c190424627a0a51b20c7ed1672.pdf
    Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump ARIZONA SENATE GOP: “Today, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of election integrity! Voters in Arizona who register with the state and do not provide proof of citizenship will be rejected.” "This is a victory for election integrity in Arizona. Only U.S. citizens should be allowed to vote in our elections. It sounds like common sense, but the radical left elected officials in our state continue to reject this notion, disrespecting the voices of our lawful Arizona voters. We are grateful the court is upholding this provision in our law, and it's time for Congress to take action to ensure only lawful U.S. citizens are voting in federal races." -Warren Petersen https://www.azsenaterepublicans.gov/_files/ugd/2f3470_b0c9c2c190424627a0a51b20c7ed1672.pdf
    Like
    1
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 9626 Visualizações
  • https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/06/breaking-9th-circuit-court-appeals-rules-mrna-covid/
    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/06/breaking-9th-circuit-court-appeals-rules-mrna-covid/
    WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM
    BREAKING: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Rules mRNA COVID-19 Jab is NOT a Vaccine Under Traditional Medical Definitions | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has delivered a seismic decision that could reshape public health policy across the nation.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 4950 Visualizações
Páginas impulsionada